360 Soziale Probleme und Sozialdienste; Verbände
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (135)
- Buch (Monographie) (96)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (7)
- Bericht (2)
Schlagworte
- Conference (130)
- Konferenz (130)
- Accident (114)
- Unfall (114)
- Germany (105)
- Deutschland (103)
- Safety (68)
- Sicherheit (66)
- Injury (62)
- Verletzung (59)
Institut
- Sonstige (240) (entfernen)
Causation patterns and data collection blind spots for fatal intersection accidents in Norway
(2010)
Norwegian fatal intersection accidents from the years 2005-2007 were analysed to identify any causation patterns among their underlying contributing factors, and also to evaluate whether the data collection and documentation procedures used by the Norwegian in-depth investigation teams produces the information necessary to perform causation pattern analysis. A total of 28 fatal accidents were analysed. Details on crash contributing factors for each driver in each crash were first coded using the Driving Reliability and Error Analysis Method (DREAM), and then aggregated based on whether the driver was going straight or turning. Analysis results indicate that turning drivers to a large extent are faced with perception difficulties and unexpected behaviour from the primary conflict vehicle, while at the same time trying to negotiate a demanding traffic situation. Drivers going straight on the other hand have less perception difficulties. Instead, their main problem is that they largely expect turning drivers to yield. When this assumption is violated, they are either slow to react or do not react at all. Contributing factors often pointed to in literature, e.g. high speed, drugs and/or alcohol and inadequate driver training, played a role in 12 of 28 accidents. While this confirms their prevalence, it also indicates that most drivers end up in these situations due to combinations of less auspicious contributing factors. In terms of data collection and documentation, information on blunt end factors (those more distant in time/space, yet important for the development of events) was more limited than information on sharp end factors (those close in time/space to the crash). A possible explanation is that analysts may view some blunt end factors as event circumstances rather than contributing factors in themselves, and therefore do not report them. There was also an asymmetry in terms of reported obstructions to view due to signposts and vegetation. While frequently reported as contributing for turning drivers, they were rarely reported as contributing for their counterparts in the same accidents. This probably reflects an involuntary focus of the analyst on identifying contributing factors for the driver legally held liable, while less attention is paid to the driver judged not at fault. Since who to blame often is irrelevant from a countermeasure development point of view, this underlying investigator mindset needs addressing to avoid future bias in crash investigation reports.
The purpose of this study was to analyse the actual injury situation of bicyclists regarding accidents involving more than one bicyclist. Bicyclists were included in a medical and technical analysis to create a basis for preventive measures and discovered repeating accident patterns and circumstances such as daytime, environment, helmet use rate. Technical and medical data were collected at the scene, shortly after accident. The population was compared focusing on bicycle versus bicycle accidents. Technical analysis included speed at crash, type of collision, impact angle, environment, used lane and relative velocity. Medical analysis included injury pattern and severity (AIS, ISS). Included were 578 injured bicyclists in 289 accidents from years 1999 to 2008, 61 percent were male (n=350) and 39 percent female (n=228). Sixty-seven percent ranged between 18 to 64 years of age, twelve percent each between 13 to 17 years of age and older than 65 years, eight percent between 6 to 12 years and one percent between 2 to 5 years.. Crashes took place in urban areas in 92 percent, in rural areas in 8 percent. Weather conditions were dry lanes in 97 percent and wet conditions in 3 percent. Eighty-three percent of all accidents happened during daytime, ten percent during night, and seven percent during dawn. The helmet use rate was only 7,5 percent in all involved bicyclists. The mean Maximum Abbreviated injury scale, Injury severity score was 1,31. Bicyclists are still minimally- or unprotected road users. The helmet use rate is unsatisfactorily low. The incidence of bicycle to bicycle crashes is high. Most of these accidents take place in urban areas. The level and pattern of injuries is moderate. Most of the more severe injuries occur to the head and could have been avoided by frequent helmet use.
An increased use of bicycles comes along with an increased number of bicycle accidents. Bicycle accidents are more frequent than recorded by the police. To evaluate the real number of bicycle accidents during 12 months in Münster, Germany, injuries were collected by the Police and in each emergency unit anonymously. 2,153 patients had to be treated in a hospital, nearly triple the number of accidents that were registered by the police. Beside fractures of the upper extremities with major surgery, traumatic brain injuries were the leading cause for hospital admission. Bicycle helmet use can reduce traumatic brain injuries and the related number of deaths and hospital admissions. Laws on bicycle helmet might decrease the use of bicycles and therefore the reduction of positive health benefits. Other methods of accident prevention may lead to positive effects as helmet legislation as well, while having no reduction in bicycle use.
The National Highways Development Project in India is aimed at upgrading over 12,000 km of national highways from 2-lane undivided roads to 4-lane divided roads. With nearly 40% of fatal crashes being reported on national highways, the effect of this project on road safety needs to be assessed. Researchers carried out on-site crash investigations and in-depth crash data collection for a period of 45 to 60 days on four 2-lane undivided highways and a 4-lane divided highway. Based on 76 crashes examined, researchers found a shift of crash pattern from head-on collisions on undivided 2- lane highways to front-rear collisions on divided 4-lane highways. This paper presents the methodology, analysis of crashes examined, and the critical safety problems identified for greater consideration in future highway development projects. This paper also highlights the need and significance of in-depth crash investigations to understand local traffic conditions and problems in India.
Accidents with vulnerable road users require special attention within the road safety work because these accidents are often accompanied with severe injuries. Thus In 2006 at least 6200 Powered Two Wheeler (PTW) riders were killed in road crashes in the EU 25 representing 16% of the total number of road deaths while accounting for only 2% of the total kilometers driven. For the prevention of accidents with VRU above all the knowledge of the causes of the accidents is of special importance. This study is based on the methodology of the German In-Depth Accident Study GIDAS. Within GIDAS extensive data on various fields of accidentology are collected on-scene from road traffic accidents with injuries in the Hannover and Dresden area. Using a well defined sample plan the collected data is highly representative to the whole German situation (Brühning et al, Otte et al). The need of in-depth accident causation data in accident research led to the development of a special tool for the collection of such data called ACASS (Accident Causation Analysis with Seven Steps), which was implemented in the GIDAS methodology in 2008 and described by Otte in 2009.
Adverse weather could impair the performance of many important parts in road transportation. In a tropical country, the threats posed by the weather phenomenon can be viewed from a different perspective as the situation may not be as extreme as snow-related problems or excessive temperature in other countries. Specifically in Malaysia, the situation may be underestimated due to several reasons such as the deficiencies in accident reporting and lack of research work. This background research has looked into various publications as well as related data to explain the need of more comprehensive research in the future.
Although ATV accidents account for numerous deaths in the US and Australia, the role in traffic accidents and hospital admissions in Germany is unknown. At a level I trauma centre, hospital and crash charts were analysed for medical and technical parameters of ATV accidents. ATV drivers were 0.1% of emergency trauma patients. The mean total hospital stayrnwas 15 days; there were 1.5 stays per patients with 2.0 surgical procedures needed. One patient died, only two recovered fully. 14 cases of ATV accidents out of 18990 (0.1%) were documented within 10 years. The mean impact velocity was 35 km/h. Car collisions were predominant. The upper extremity was the predominant injured region (AIS 0.7), Mean maximum AIS was 1.4. ATV accidents in Germany are rare but pose high risk for severe injuries. Possible reasons are low active and passive security, limited experience and risky driving behaviour. Preventive measures are discussed.rn
Die vorliegende Untersuchung gibt einen zusammenfassenden Überblick über die Leistungen des öffentlichen Rettungsdienstes in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im Zeitraum 2008/09. Das Forschungsprojekt 87.012/2008 "Analyse des Leistungsniveaus im Rettungsdienst für die Jahre 2008 und 2009" erfasst und analysiert eine repraesentative Stichprobe von Einsatzdaten zur Beurteilung der Leistungsfähigkeit des öffentlichen Rettungsdienstes in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Die wesentlichsten Ergebnisse des Forschungsprojektes sind: " Bundesweit werden im öffentlichen Rettungsdienst im Zeitraum 2008/09 jährlich rund 11,4 Mio. Einsätze mit insgesamt 14,2 Mio. Einsatzfahrten durchgeführt. Die Einsatzrate beträgt rund 143 Einsätze pro 1.000 Einwohner und Jahr. " An einem mittleren Werktag gehen bundesweit rund 35.000 rettungsdienstliche Hilfeersuchen in den Rettungsleitstellen ein. Am Wochenende sinkt die Zahl der eingehenden Hilfeersuchen auf rund 26.000 an einem mittleren Samstag und auf rund 24.000 an einem mittleren Sonntag. " 49 % des Einsatzaufkommens werden vom Leitstellenpersonal als Notfall eingestuft, 51 % entfallen auf die Kategorie Krankentransport. " Praktisch die Hälfte aller Notfalleinsätze werden unter Hinzunahme eines Notarztes durchgeführt (Notarzteinsatz). Ein Drittel der Notfälle zu Verkehrsunfaellen (32 %) wird von einem Notarzt bedient. " Das Rendezvous-System hat sich mit einem Anteil von 99,1 % gegenüber dem Stationssystem bundesweit durchgesetzt. " Rund jeder 17. Notfalleinsatz gilt einem Verkehrsunfall, was bundesweit rund 336.000 Einsätzen entspricht. Die Verteilung der übrigen Einsatzanlässe bei Notfällen mit und ohne Notarztbeteiligung beträgt: Internistischer Notfall 46 %, Sonstiger Notfall (z. B. Verbrechen, Suizid, dringende Blut- und Organtransporte) 37 %, Sonstiger Unfall (z.B. Haus-, Schul- und Sportunfall) 11 % und Arbeitsunfall unter 1 %. " Die Verteilung der Rettungsmitteltypen am bundesweiten Einsatzfahrtaufkommen im Zeitraum 2008/09 betraegt: RTW 52 %, KTW 29 %, NEF 18 %, NAW und RTH/ITH unter 1 %. " Beim Einsatzfahrtaufkommen werden rund die Haelfte der Einsatzfahrten mit Sonderrechten auf Anfahrt durchgeführt. Dies entspricht bundesweit jährlich 7,2 Mio. Einsatzfahrten unter Sonderrechten auf Anfahrt. " Das Einsatzfahrtaufkommen weist im Bundesgebiet 2008/09 einen Fehlfahrtanteil von unter 6 % auf. Bundesweit sind dies jährlich rund 808.000 Fehlfahrten. " Die Dispositions- und Alarmierungszeit bei Einsatzfahrten mit Sonderrechten auf Anfahrt beträgt im Mittel 2,1 Minuten. Bei Einsatzfahrten ohne Sonderrechte auf Anfahrt liegt die Dispositionsund Alarmierungszeit im Mittel bei 14,3 Minuten. " Bei Einsätzen mit Sonderrechten auf Anfahrt errechnet sich nach dem zuerst eingetroffenen Rettungsmittel am Einsatzort eine mittlere Hilfsfrist von 8,7 Minuten, wobei 95 % der Notfälle innerhalb von 16,7 Minuten mit einem Rettungsmittel bedient werden. " Die mittlere Hilfsfrist zu Verkehrsunfällen beträgt an Straßen innerorts am Tag 8,8 Minuten und in der Nacht 9,4 Minuten, an Straßen außerorts am Tag 10,4 Minuten und in der Nacht 10,9 Minuten. " Die Unterscheidung der Einsatzzeit nach Notfällen und Krankentransporten unter zwei Stunden ergibt eine mittlere Einsatzzeit von 51 Minuten für Einsatzfahrten mit Sonderrechten auf Anfahrt und 53 Minuten für Einsatzfahrten ohne Sonderrechte auf Anfahrt. " Die Transportzeit bei Einsatzfahrten mit Sonderrechten auf Anfahrt beträgt im Mittel 12,3 Minuten. Bei Einsatzfahrten ohne Sonderrechte auf Anfahrt liegt die Transportzeit im Mittel bei 16,1 Minuten. " Die Verweilzeit am Transportziel/Wiederherstellungszeit bei Einsatzfahrten mit Sonderrechten auf Anfahrt beträgt im Mittel 20,1 Minuten, während bei Einsatzfahrten ohne Sonderrechte auf Anfahrt der Vergleichswert im Mittel bei 15,9 Minuten liegt. " Die weiteren Ergebnisse der Pilotstudie zur Machbarkeit einer Datenerhebung und -analyse über die Ermittlung der Verletzungsschwere bei Verkehrsunfallopfern zeigen, dass die Analyse mittels Daten sowohl zur Rückmeldezahl in Hessen als auch mit Hilfe von DIVI-Notarztprotokollen möglich ist. Dabei ist eine Klassifikation mit Hilfe von Geodaten EDV-gestuetzt umsetzbar, um eine vergleichende Auswertebasis zu bilden.
Who doesn't wear seat belts?
(2009)
Using real world accident data, seat belts were estimated to be 61% effective at preventing fatalities, and 32% effective at preventing serious injuries. They were most effective for drivers with an airbag. Seat belts were estimated as having prevented 57,000 fatalities and 213,000 seriously injured casualties in the UK since 1983. Seat belt legislation was estimated to have prevented 31,000 fatalities and 118,000 seriously injured casualties. A future increase in effective seat belt wearing rate (which takes into account seating position) in the UK from 92.5% to 93% may prevent casualties valued at a societal cost of over -£18 million per year. To target a seat belt campaign, the question "who doesn"t wear seat belts?" must be answered. Seat belt wearing rates and the number of unbelted casualties were analysed. It was primarily young adult males who didn"t wear seat belts, and they made up the majority of unbelted fatalities and seriously injured casualties.
In a first step, we have examined approximately 23 000 single vehicle accidents within the Austrian National Statistics database. In a second step, we considered 15% of all fatal "running off the road" accidents that occurred in Austria in 2003. As a result, two accident categories were specified; "leaving the road without preceding manoeuvre" and "leaving the road with preceding manoeuvre". These two categories can be basically characterised by the vehicle- heading angle and its velocity angle. In this report, we further suggest theoretical approaches for the dimensioning of a safety zone, an area adjacent to the road free of fixed objects or dangerous slopes. We also show the link between the two accident categories mentioned above and the real world accidents analysed in detail. These observations also form the basis for the required length for safety devices. Finally, we summarise accident avoidance strategies.