81 Unfallstatistik
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
- 2010 (25)
- 2007 (21)
- 2013 (21)
- 2009 (20)
- 2005 (17)
- 2004 (10)
- 2008 (7)
- 2000 (6)
- 2002 (6)
- 2015 (6)
- 1997 (5)
- 1998 (5)
- 1996 (4)
- 2001 (4)
- 1995 (3)
- 2003 (3)
- 2017 (3)
- 1978 (2)
- 1989 (2)
- 1990 (2)
- 1991 (2)
- 1993 (2)
- 2006 (2)
- 2014 (2)
- 2016 (2)
- 1974 (1)
- 1981 (1)
- 1985 (1)
- 1986 (1)
- 1987 (1)
- 1988 (1)
- 2011 (1)
- 2012 (1)
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (90)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (42)
- Buch (Monographie) (39)
- Arbeitspapier (11)
- Teil eines Buches (Kapitel) (5)
- Bericht (3)
Schlagworte
- Accident (148)
- Unfall (148)
- Statistik (98)
- Statistics (94)
- Deutschland (88)
- Germany (88)
- Conference (86)
- Konferenz (86)
- Fatality (72)
- Tödlicher Unfall (70)
Institut
Internationally, the need is expressed for harmonized traffic accident data collection (PSN, PENDANT, etc.). Together with this effort of harmonization, traffic accident investigation moves more and more in the direction of accident causation. As current methods only partly address these needs, a new method was set up. The main characteristics of this method are: • Accident/injury causation (associated) factors can objectively be identified and quantified, by comparison with exposure information from a normal population. • All relevant accident and exposure data can be included: human-, vehicle-, and environmental related data for the pre-crash, crash and postcrash situation (the so-called Haddon matrix). The level of detail can be chosen depending on interest and/or budget, which makes the method very flexible. In this paper the accident collection and control group method are presented, including some of the achieved results from a pilot study on 30 truck accidents and 30 control locations. The data were analyzed by using cross-tabulations and classification-tree analysis. The method proved useful for the identification of statistically significant causational aspects.
This study that was funded by the Research Association for Automotive Technology (FAT) develops a method for the evaluation of the placement of tanks or batteries by using the deformation frequencies in real-world accidents. Therefore, the deformations of more than 20.000 passenger cars in the GIDAS database are analysed. For each vehicle a contour of deformation is calculated and the deformed areas of the vehicles are transferred in a rangy matrix of deformation. Thereby, the vehicle is divided into more than 190.000 cells. Afterwards, all single matrices of deformation are summarized for each cell which allows representative analyses of the deformation frequencies of accidents with passenger cars in Germany. On the basis of these deformation frequencies it is possible to determine least deformed areas of all passenger cars. Furthermore, intended placements of tanks or batteries can be estimated in an early stage of development. Therefore, all vehicles with deformations in the intended tank areas can be analysed individually. Considering numerous parameters out of the GIDAS database (e.g. collision speed, kind of accident, overlap, collision partner etc.) the occurring forces can be calculated or the deformation frequency can be estimated. Furthermore, it is possible to consider the influence of primary and secondary safety systems on the deformation behaviour. The analysis of "worst case accident events" is an additional application of the calculated matrix of deformation frequency.
Methods for analyzing the efficiency of primary safety measures based on real life accident data
(2009)
Primary safety measures are designed to help to avoid accidents or, if this is not possible, to stabilize respectively reduce the dynamics of the vehicle to such an extent that the secondary safety measures are able to act as good as possible. The efficiency of a primary safety measure is a criterion for the effectiveness, with which a system of primary safety succeeds in avoiding or mitigation the severity of accidents within its range of operation and in interactionwith driver and vehicle. Based on Daimler-´s philosophy of the "Real Life Safety" the reflection of the real world accidents in the systems range of operation is both starting point as well as benchmark for its optimization. This paper deals with the methodology to perform assessments of statistical representative efficiency of primary safety measures. To be able to carry out an investigation concerning the efficiency of a primary safety measure in a transparent and comparable way basic definitions and systematics were introduced. Based on these definitions different systematic methods for estimating efficiency were discussed and related to each other. The paper is completed by presenting an example for estimating the efficiency of actual "single" and "multi" connected primary safety systems.
While the number of fatal accidents is diminishing every year, there is still a need of improvement and action to prevent these deaths. Basis for this purpose has to be an analysis about the factors influencing the car crash mortality. There are various studies describing the univariate influence of several factors, but crash scenarios are too complex to be described by a single variable. The multivariate analysis respects the interference of the variables and gets so to more detailed and representative results. This multivariate analysis is based on about 2,600 cases (the data have been collected by the accident research units Hannover and Dresden (during the years 1999-2003). This paper presents a multivariate model (containing ten different variables) which detects 93% of these cases properly. This means it detects the cases as truly survived and truly death.
Empirical vehicle crashworthiness studies are usually based on national or in-depth traffic accident surveys: Data on accident-involved cars/drivers are analysed in order to quantify the chance of driver injury and to assess certain risk factors like car make and model. As the cars/drivers involved in the same accident form a "cluster", where the size of the cluster equals the number of accident-involved parties, traffic accident survey data are typical multi-level data with accidents as first-level or primary and cars/drivers as secondlevel or secondary units (car occupants in general are to be considered as third level units). Consequently, appropriate statistical multi-level models are to be used for driver injury risk estimation purposes as these models properly account for the cluster structure of traffic accident survey data. In recent years various types of regression models for clustered data have been developed in the statistical sciences. This paper presents multi-level statistical models, which are generally applicable for vehicle crashworthiness assessment in the sense that data on single and multiple car crashes can be analysed simultaneously. As a special case of multi-level modelling driver injury risk estimation based on paired-by-collision car/driver data is considered. It is demonstrated that assessment results may be seriously biased, if the cluster structure inherent in traffic accident survey data is erroneously ignored in the data analysis stage.
While it is important to track trends in the number of road accidents in different countries using national statistics, there is a need for data with more detailed information, so called in-depth accident data. For this reason, several accident data projects emerged worldwide in recent years. However, also different data standards were established and so comparative analysis of international in-depth data has been very hard to conduct, so far. This is why the project iGLAD (Initiative for the Global Harmonization of Accident Data) was established and created the prerequisites for building up a standardized dataset out of the common denominator of different in-depth accident databases from Europe, USA and Asia. In the first phase, the project received funding from ACEA to compile an initial database. To accomplish this, a suitable data scheme has been defined, a pilot study has been conducted as proof of concept and the recoding of the first common data base has been initiated. Also, to prepare the project for its self-supporting continuation in the next years, a business model has been developed. This paper reports the history and status of the project, the current challenges and the creation of a capable consortium to maintain the data. In mid-2014, the initial database containing 1550 cases from 10 different countries will be completed and a first detailed view on this data will be possible.
Over the last decades the number of traffic accident fatalities on German roads decreased by 77% down to 4968 in the year 2007. This positive development is due to optimisations of vehicle safety, roads and infrastructure and medical rescue issues. Up to now mostly the optimisations of secondary safety measures lead to this effect on vehicle safety. Since some years more and more driver assistance systems are available and lead to a further reduction of all accidents. These new systems are often comfort systems and have not primarily been developed to increase vehicle safety. In contrast to secondary safety systems primary safety systems are able to mitigate and avoid accidents. So in the future it is important to estimate the benefit of these systems in reducing accident numbers as well. Current benefit estimation methods mostly focus on a single system only and not on the combination of systems. In this paper a new method for a multivariate benefit estimation based on real accident data is developed. The paper describes the basic method to estimate the benefit of primary and secondary safety systems in combination. With the presented method the benefit will not be overestimated as it would be by a simple addition of the benefits of single systems. The model will be validated by a multivariate prospective benefit estimation of different vehicle safety systems in comparison to single benefit estimations of the same systems. For this the German In-Depth Accident Database is used. The results show the importance to implement the interactions of safety systems in the estimation process and rate the overestimation by a simple addition of the single system benefits. The validation includes primary and secondary safety systems in combination. The validation is done using more than 3500 real accidents which were initiated by cars. This sample out of the GIDAS database is representative for the current accident situation in Germany. The paper shows the necessity of a multivariate estimation of the benefit for existing and future safety systems.
Nachtunfälle : eine Analyse auf der Grundlage der Daten der amtlichen Straßenverkehrsunfallstatistik
(1978)
Im Anschluss an eine Charakterisierung der Nachtunfälle anhand von Einzelstudien werden Untersuchungen referiert, die die Auswirkungen bestimmter Umstände betreffen (Alkohol, Witterungseinflüsse, Unterschiede im Verkehrsaufkommen, Einfluss straßenbaulicher Merkmale, spezielle Orientierungsprobleme, Leistungsfähigkeit des Rettungsdienstes, Gurtanlegeverhalten). Anschließend wird über Untersuchungen berichtet, die die Wirksamkeit von Maßnahmen zur Reduzierung der Nachtunfälle betreffen (Wirksamkeit von Alkoholkampagnen, Überwachungsmaßnahmen und gesetzlichen Regelungen; Beleuchtung bzw. Sichtbarkeit des Verkehrsraumes; Wirksamkeitsuntersuchungen beleuchteter Fußgängerüberwege; Beleuchtung und Sichtbarkeit der Verkehrsteilnehmer; Verbesserung der optischen Führung durch Fahrbahnmarkierungen; Blendschutzeinrichtungen; Wildschutzzäune; Einführung der Sommerzeit; Verbesserung der Unfallrettung). Abschließend werden Fragestellungen vorgelegt, zu denen bisher keine befriedigenden Aussagen vorliegen. - Im zweiten Teil wird zunächst die Bedeutung der Nachtunfälle innerhalb des gesamten Unfallgeschehens in der zeitlichen Entwicklung dargestellt. Anschließend werden die kennzeichnenden Parameter des Unfallgeschehens für Unfälle mit Personenschaden erörtert (Art der Verkehrsteilnahme, Lebensalter sowie Geschlecht der Fußgänger bzw. Fahrer, Ortslage, Uhrzeit, Straßenzustand, Unfalltypen und -ursachen). Danach folgt eine mehrdimensionale Betrachtung zu ausgewählten Problembereichen (Unfallursache Alkohol, ungünstige Witterungsverhältnisse, jugendliche Fahrer von motorisierten Zweirädern, Pkw-Fahrer, Fußgänger). Schließlich wird über künftige Auswertungen berichtet.
NASS: the glass is half full
(2007)
The National Accident Sampling System (NASS) was born in the late 1970s. It was based on a substantial amount of experience and analysis of what was needed in the United States to understand the safety challenges of our highways. This work also showed how to collect high quality and useful crash data efficiently. Unfortunately, when Ronald Reagan - a President who believed in limited government - was elected, any hope of full funding for NASS was lost. The concept of 75 teams investigating about 18,000 serious crashes in detail annually was never realized. The system got up to 50 teams, then was cut to 36, and finally to 24 teams investigating fewer than a quarter of the originally anticipated number of crashes per year. Despite this, the NASS investigations provide a rich source of data, collected according to a sophisticated statistical sampling system to facilitate detailed national estimates of road casualties on our nation- highways and their causes. In addition, changes have been made in recent years to increase the number of more serious crashes of recent model vehicles to make the results more relevant to improving vehicle safety. A recent, detailed examination of hundreds of rollovers has provided considerable insight into rollover casualties and into what can be done to reduce them. Some of these results will be presented that show the value of the NASS system. Our experience with NASS and the Fatal Accident Reporting System (FARS) suggests a number of improvements that could be made in the United States" crash data systems. It also provides justification for a doubling or tripling of our national expenditures on crash data collection.
Der Autor berichtet über eine Analyse der Straßenverkehrsunfälle in Deutschland mit der allgemeinen Unfallursache "Nebel" in den Jahren 1995 bis 1999. Der Anteil der Nebelunfälle und der Verunglückten bei Nebelunfällen an allen Unfällen beziehungsweise Verunglückten im Straßenverkehr liegt unter 1 Prozent. Der Anteil der Getöteten und Schwerverletzten bei Nebelunfällen ist höher als der Anteil der Nebelunfälle, was auf deren besondere Schwere schließen lässt.