81 Unfallstatistik
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (90) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Conference (86)
- Konferenz (86)
- Accident (59)
- Unfall (58)
- Statistics (37)
- Statistik (37)
- Germany (33)
- Deutschland (32)
- Injury (32)
- Fatality (31)
- Tödlicher Unfall (30)
- Verletzung (30)
- Data acquisition (27)
- Datenerfassung (27)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (26)
- Analyse (math) (23)
- Reconstruction (accid) (23)
- Analysis (math) (22)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (21)
- Severity (accid, injury) (21)
- Datenbank (20)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (16)
- Data bank (15)
- On the spot accident investigation (15)
- Ursache (15)
- Cause (14)
- Motorcyclist (14)
- Motorradfahrer (14)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (14)
- Fußgänger (13)
- Pedestrian (13)
- Severity (accid (13)
- Verletzung) (13)
- injury) (13)
- Car (12)
- Europa (11)
- Europe (11)
- Fahrzeug (11)
- Accident rate (10)
- Unfallverhütung (10)
- Vehicle (10)
- Accident prevention (9)
- Cyclist (9)
- Radfahrer (9)
- Safety (9)
- Sicherheit (9)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (9)
- Driver (8)
- Geschwindigkeit (8)
- Motorcycle (8)
- Motorrad (8)
- PKW (8)
- Risiko (8)
- Simulation (8)
- Collision (7)
- Fahrer (7)
- Method (7)
- Speed (7)
- Verfahren (7)
- Zusammenstoß (7)
- Active safety system (6)
- Insasse (6)
- Risk (6)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (5)
- Alte Leute (5)
- Bewertung (5)
- Database (5)
- Evaluation (assessment) (5)
- Old people (5)
- Rear end collision (5)
- Rechenmodell (5)
- Vehicle occupant (5)
- Analyse (Math) (4)
- Anfahrversuch (4)
- Auffahrunfall (4)
- Berechnung (4)
- Calculation (4)
- Crash helmet (4)
- Efficiency (4)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (4)
- Improvement (4)
- India (4)
- Indien (4)
- Mathematical model (4)
- Pkw (4)
- Portugal (4)
- Risikobewertung (4)
- Schutzhelm (4)
- Verbesserung (4)
- Verminderung (4)
- Accident reconstruction (3)
- Benutzung (3)
- Child (3)
- Decrease (3)
- Development (3)
- Driver assistance system (3)
- Entwicklung (3)
- Fahranfänger (3)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (3)
- Head on collision (3)
- Hospital (3)
- Japan (3)
- Kind (3)
- Krankenhaus (3)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (3)
- Lorry (3)
- Overturning (veh) (3)
- Passive safety system (3)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (3)
- Recently qualified driver (3)
- Risk assessment (3)
- USA (3)
- United Kingdom (3)
- Use (3)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (3)
- Verkehrsteilnehmer (3)
- Überschlagen (3)
- Adolescent (2)
- Australia (2)
- Australien (2)
- Belastung (2)
- Bicycle (2)
- Classification (2)
- Compatibility (2)
- Czech Republic (2)
- Deformation (2)
- EU (2)
- Education (2)
- Eindringung (2)
- Eingabedaten (2)
- Electronic stability program (2)
- Error (2)
- Erziehung (2)
- Fahrrad (2)
- Fehler (2)
- Head (2)
- Highway (2)
- Human factor (2)
- Impact test (2)
- Impact test (veh) (2)
- Information (2)
- Information documentation (2)
- Input data (2)
- International (2)
- Interview (2)
- Jugendlicher (2)
- Junction (2)
- Klassifizierung (2)
- Kleidung (2)
- Knotenpunkt (2)
- Kompatibilität (2)
- Kopf (2)
- Lkw (2)
- Load (2)
- Menschlicher Faktor (2)
- Modification (2)
- Overlapping (2)
- Penetration (2)
- Prevention (2)
- Road user (2)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (2)
- Side impact (2)
- Software (2)
- Specifications (2)
- Standardisierung (2)
- Theorie (2)
- Theory (2)
- Trend (stat) (2)
- Tschechische Republik (2)
- Verformung (2)
- Veränderung (2)
- Zeitreihe (stat) (2)
- Überlappung (2)
- Abbiegen (1)
- Abstandsregeltempomat (1)
- Accident severity (1)
- Adaptive cruise controll (1)
- Administration (1)
- Age (1)
- Air bag (restraint system) (1)
- Airbag (1)
- Alter (1)
- Analyse (1)
- Attitude (psychol) (1)
- Auffharunfall (1)
- Ausrüstung (1)
- Austria (1)
- Batterie (1)
- Battery (1)
- Behaviour (1)
- Bein [menschl] (1)
- Bepflanzung (1)
- Brake (1)
- Braking (1)
- Bremse (1)
- Bremsung (1)
- Bus (1)
- Causes (1)
- China (1)
- Clothing (1)
- Coach (1)
- Coefficient of friction (1)
- Colthing (1)
- Cost (1)
- Cycle track (1)
- Decreases (1)
- Delivery vehicle (1)
- Deutschalnd (1)
- Driver training (1)
- Driving aptitude (1)
- Droge (1)
- Drugs (1)
- Drunkenness (1)
- Eins (1)
- Einstellung (psychol) (1)
- Electronic driving aid (1)
- Elektronische Fahrhilfe (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogram (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Equipment (1)
- Fahrausbildung (1)
- Fahrstabilität (1)
- Fahrtüchtigkeit (1)
- Fahrzeugteil (Sicherheit) (1)
- Fernverkehrsstraße (1)
- Financing (1)
- Finanzierung (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Forecast (1)
- Forschungsarbeit (1)
- Fracture (bone) (1)
- France (1)
- Frankreich (1)
- Frequency (1)
- Front (1)
- Fuel tank (1)
- Geländefahrzeug (1)
- Geradeausverkehr (1)
- Gesetzesübertretung (1)
- Government (national) (1)
- Griffigkeit (1)
- Harmonisation (1)
- Hazard (1)
- Human body (1)
- Häufigkeit (1)
- Impact study (1)
- Intoxication (1)
- Jahreszeit (1)
- Knochenbruch (1)
- Kontrolle (1)
- Korea (Süd) (1)
- Kosten (1)
- Kraftstofftank (1)
- LKW (1)
- Leg (human) (1)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (Allg.) (1)
- Lieferfahrzeug (1)
- Location (1)
- Main road (1)
- Man (1)
- Mann (1)
- Mathematical Model (1)
- Measurement (1)
- Medical aspects (1)
- Medizinische Gesichtspunkte (1)
- Menschlicher Körper (1)
- Messung (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Mobility (1)
- Mobilität (1)
- Motorisierungsgrad (1)
- Netherlands (1)
- Niederlande (1)
- Norway (1)
- Norwegen (1)
- Nutzwertanalyse (1)
- Oberflächentextur (1)
- Occupant (veh) (1)
- Offence (1)
- On the spot investigation (1)
- One (1)
- Ort (Position) (1)
- Partnerschaft (1)
- Partnership (1)
- Passenger (1)
- Planning (1)
- Planung (1)
- Policy (1)
- Politik (1)
- Public transport (1)
- QAccident (1)
- Quality (1)
- Quality assurance (1)
- Qualität (1)
- Qualitätssicherung (1)
- Radweg (1)
- Rail bound transport (1)
- Rail traffic (1)
- Reconstruction [accid] (1)
- Regierung (staat) (1)
- Regression analysis (1)
- Regressionsanalyse (1)
- Reibungsbeiwert (1)
- Reisebus (1)
- Republic of Korea (1)
- Research project (1)
- Residential area (1)
- Richtlinie (1)
- Richtlinien (1)
- Road traffic (1)
- Road transport (1)
- Rsk (1)
- Safety belt (1)
- Schienentransport (1)
- Schienenverkehr (1)
- Schweden (1)
- Schweiz (1)
- Schätzung (1)
- Season (1)
- Sicherheitsgurt (1)
- Significance (1)
- Signifikanz (1)
- Skidding resistance (1)
- Speed) (1)
- Spinal column (1)
- Sport utility vehicle (1)
- Standardization (1)
- Steifigkeit (1)
- Stiffness (1)
- Straight ahead (traffic) (1)
- Strasse (1)
- Straße (1)
- Straßentransport (1)
- Straßenverkehr (1)
- Surface texture (1)
- Surveillance (1)
- Switzerland (1)
- Technologie (1)
- Technology (1)
- Telematics (1)
- Telematik (1)
- Test (1)
- Thailand (1)
- Traffic (1)
- Transport operator (1)
- Transportunternehmen (1)
- Traveler (1)
- Trunkenheit (1)
- Turn (1)
- Underride prevention (1)
- Unfallrate (1)
- Unfallrekonsruktion (1)
- Unfallverhütug (1)
- United kingdom (1)
- Unterfahrschutz (1)
- Value analysis (1)
- Variance analysis (1)
- Varianzanalyse (1)
- Vegetation (1)
- Vehicle handling (1)
- Vehicle ownership (1)
- Vehicle safety device (1)
- Veletzung) (1)
- Vereinigtes Königreichl (1)
- Verhalten (1)
- Verkehr (1)
- Verkehrsinfrastruktur (1)
- Versuch (1)
- Verwaltung (1)
- Vorn (1)
- Weather (1)
- Wirbelsäule (1)
- Wirksamkeitsuntersuchung (1)
- Witterung (1)
- Wohngebiet (1)
- aktives Sicherheitssystem (1)
- analyses (math) (1)
- ar (1)
- tödlicher Unfall (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Österreich (1)
Institut
Small overlap frontal crashes are defined by a damage pattern with most of the vehicle deformation concentrated outboard of the main longitudinal structures. These crashes are prominent among frontal crashes resulting in serious and fatal injuries, even among vehicles that perform well in regulatory and consumer information crash tests. One of the critical aspects of understanding these crashes is knowing the crash speeds that cause the types of damage associated with serious injuries. Laboratory crash tests were conducted using 12 vehicles in three small overlap test conditions: pole, vehicle-to-vehicle collinear, and vehicle-to-vehicle oblique (15-degree striking angle). Field reconstruction techniques were used to estimate the delta V for each vehicle, and these results were compared with actual delta V values based on vehicle accelerometer data. Estimated delta Vs were 50% lower than actual values. Velocity change estimates for small overlap frontal crashes in databases such as NASS-CDS significantly underestimate actual values.
Causation patterns and data collection blind spots for fatal intersection accidents in Norway
(2010)
Norwegian fatal intersection accidents from the years 2005-2007 were analysed to identify any causation patterns among their underlying contributing factors, and also to evaluate whether the data collection and documentation procedures used by the Norwegian in-depth investigation teams produces the information necessary to perform causation pattern analysis. A total of 28 fatal accidents were analysed. Details on crash contributing factors for each driver in each crash were first coded using the Driving Reliability and Error Analysis Method (DREAM), and then aggregated based on whether the driver was going straight or turning. Analysis results indicate that turning drivers to a large extent are faced with perception difficulties and unexpected behaviour from the primary conflict vehicle, while at the same time trying to negotiate a demanding traffic situation. Drivers going straight on the other hand have less perception difficulties. Instead, their main problem is that they largely expect turning drivers to yield. When this assumption is violated, they are either slow to react or do not react at all. Contributing factors often pointed to in literature, e.g. high speed, drugs and/or alcohol and inadequate driver training, played a role in 12 of 28 accidents. While this confirms their prevalence, it also indicates that most drivers end up in these situations due to combinations of less auspicious contributing factors. In terms of data collection and documentation, information on blunt end factors (those more distant in time/space, yet important for the development of events) was more limited than information on sharp end factors (those close in time/space to the crash). A possible explanation is that analysts may view some blunt end factors as event circumstances rather than contributing factors in themselves, and therefore do not report them. There was also an asymmetry in terms of reported obstructions to view due to signposts and vegetation. While frequently reported as contributing for turning drivers, they were rarely reported as contributing for their counterparts in the same accidents. This probably reflects an involuntary focus of the analyst on identifying contributing factors for the driver legally held liable, while less attention is paid to the driver judged not at fault. Since who to blame often is irrelevant from a countermeasure development point of view, this underlying investigator mindset needs addressing to avoid future bias in crash investigation reports.
Recent findings from real-world accident data have shown that fatality risks for pedestrians are substantially lower than generally reported in the traffic safety literature. One of the keys to this insight has been the large and random sample of car-to-pedestrian crashes available in the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS). Another key factor has been the proper use of weight factors in order to adjust for outcome-based sampling bias in the accident data. However, a third factor, a priori of unknown importance, has not yet been properly analysed. This is the influence of errors in impact speed estimation. In this study, we derived a statistical model of the impact speed errors for pedestrian accidents present in the GIDAS database. The error model was then applied to investigate the effect of the estimation error on the pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed. To this end, we applied a method known as the SIMulation-EXtrapolation (SIMEX) method. It was found that the risk curve is fairly tolerant to some amount of random measurement error, but that it does become flattened. It is therefore important that the accident investigations and reconstructions are of high quality to assure that systematic errors are minimised and that the random errors are under control.
The NHTSA-sponsored Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) has collected and analyzed crash, vehicle damage, and detailed injury data from over 4000 case occupants who were patients admitted to Level-I trauma centers following involvement in motor vehicle crashes. Since 2005, CIREN has used a methodology known as "BioTab" to analyze and document the causes of injuries resulting from passenger vehicle crashes. BioTab was developed to provide a complete evidenced-based method to describe and document injury causation from in-depth crash investigations with confidence levels assigned to the causes of injury based on the available evidence. This paper describes how the BioTab method is being used in CIREN to leverage the data collected from in-depth crash investigations, and particularly the detailed injury data available in CIREN, to develop evidence-based assessments of injury causation. CIREN case examples are provided to demonstrate the ability of the BioTab method to improve real-world crash/injury data assessment.
Crash involvement studies using routine accident and exposure data : a case for case-control designs
(2009)
Fortunately, accident involvement is a rare event: the chance of an individual road user trip to end up in a crash is close to zero. Thus, according to general epidemiological principles one can expect the case-control study design to be especially suitable for quantifying the relative risk (odds ratio) of accident involvement of road users with a certain risk factor as compared to road users that do not have this characteristic. Ideally, of course, the database for such a case-control study should be established by drawing two independent random samples of cases (accidental units) and controls (nonaccidental units), respectively. If, however, special data collection is not an option, it is nevertheless possible to analyze routine accident and exposure data under a case-control design in order to fully exploit the information contained in already existing databases. As a prerequisite, accident and exposure data from different sources are to be combined in a single file of micro or grouped data in a way consistent with the case-control study design. Among other things, the proposed methodological approach offers the possibility to use in-depth data of the GIDAS type also in investigations of active vehicle safety by combining this data with appropriate vehicle trip data collected in mobility surveys.
Methods for analyzing the efficiency of primary safety measures based on real life accident data
(2009)
Primary safety measures are designed to help to avoid accidents or, if this is not possible, to stabilize respectively reduce the dynamics of the vehicle to such an extent that the secondary safety measures are able to act as good as possible. The efficiency of a primary safety measure is a criterion for the effectiveness, with which a system of primary safety succeeds in avoiding or mitigation the severity of accidents within its range of operation and in interactionwith driver and vehicle. Based on Daimler-´s philosophy of the "Real Life Safety" the reflection of the real world accidents in the systems range of operation is both starting point as well as benchmark for its optimization. This paper deals with the methodology to perform assessments of statistical representative efficiency of primary safety measures. To be able to carry out an investigation concerning the efficiency of a primary safety measure in a transparent and comparable way basic definitions and systematics were introduced. Based on these definitions different systematic methods for estimating efficiency were discussed and related to each other. The paper is completed by presenting an example for estimating the efficiency of actual "single" and "multi" connected primary safety systems.
Who doesn't wear seat belts?
(2009)
Using real world accident data, seat belts were estimated to be 61% effective at preventing fatalities, and 32% effective at preventing serious injuries. They were most effective for drivers with an airbag. Seat belts were estimated as having prevented 57,000 fatalities and 213,000 seriously injured casualties in the UK since 1983. Seat belt legislation was estimated to have prevented 31,000 fatalities and 118,000 seriously injured casualties. A future increase in effective seat belt wearing rate (which takes into account seating position) in the UK from 92.5% to 93% may prevent casualties valued at a societal cost of over -£18 million per year. To target a seat belt campaign, the question "who doesn"t wear seat belts?" must be answered. Seat belt wearing rates and the number of unbelted casualties were analysed. It was primarily young adult males who didn"t wear seat belts, and they made up the majority of unbelted fatalities and seriously injured casualties.
Each year the traffic accident research teams in Dresden and Hanover provide an in-depth investigation of approximately two thousand accidents, aggregated in the GIDAS database. To accomplish a comprehensive review of each traffic accident recorded, a sensible and thorough encoding of suffered injuries is indispensable. The Abbreviated Injury Scale by AAAM offers a valuable and handy solution to achieve this goal. However, there were a few difficulties in the use of the AIS that came up in the past, which let to necessary improvements for the utilization of the AIS 2005 for GIDAS.
A set of recommendations for pan-European transparent and independent road accident investigations has been developed by the SafetyNet project. The aim of these recommendations is to pave the way for future EU scale accident investigation activities by setting out the necessary steps for establishing safety oriented road accident investigations in Member States. This can be seen as the start of the process for establishing road accident investigations throughout Europe which operate according to a common methodology. The recommendations propose a European Safety Oriented Road Accident Investigation Programme which sets out the procedures that need to be put in place to investigate a sample of every day road accidents. They address four sets of issues; institutional addressing the characteristics of the programme; operational describing the conditions under which data isrncollected; data storage and protection; and reports, countermeasures and the dissemination of data.rn
Nowadays, traffic accidents are recorded in historical databases. Regarding the huge quantity of data, the use of data mining tools is essential to help Experts, for automatically extracting relevant information in order to establish and quantify relations between severity and potential factors of accidents. An innovative approach is here proposed for an in depth investigation of real world accidents data base. Mutual information ratio based on conditional entropies is used to quantity the association strength between an accident outcome descriptor (injury severity) and other potential association factors. Information theoretic methods help to select automatically groups of factors mostly responsible of the severity of accident.