81 Unfallstatistik
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (90)
- Buch (Monographie) (33)
- Arbeitspapier (11)
- Bericht (3)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (1)
Volltext vorhanden
- ja (138) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Accident (103)
- Unfall (102)
- Conference (86)
- Konferenz (86)
- Statistik (66)
- Deutschland (64)
- Germany (64)
- Statistics (64)
- Fatality (48)
- Tödlicher Unfall (46)
Traffic accidents were ranked the third among the major causes of death in Thailand. About 13,438 deaths and the death rate from traffic accident was 21.5 per 100,000 of population in 2002. The deaths and death rate varied upon the economic situation. After the economic crisis, traffic accidents were increased as well as the period of the bubble economy. In the Central region of Thailand numbers of road traffic crashes were lower than Bangkok Metropolis, but the highest in the number of deaths, death rate and serious injuries in 2002. Men aged 15"29 years old had higher numbers of deaths than men in other age groups and higher than women. Deaths and injuries from road traffic crashes were the highest in April and January, because there was a long weekend in those months. About 80 percent of road traffic crashes were caused by private car and motorcycle. In 2000 about 51 percent of traffic accidents took place on the straight way, followed by the junction and curves. In 2002, about 97 percent of road traffic crashes were caused by human factors including improper passing, speeding and disregarding to traffic signal, however, the identification of causes of traffic accident needed to improve. Drunk driving, disregarding on safety equipment usage, inefficiency of law enforcement and discontinuing of road safety programs were the deepest causes of traffic accidents. Research based information, a broad coalition of stakeholder and urban planning policy were needed to incorporate for a comprehensive road safety policy formulation and actions.
A total survey of road traffic accidents involving most severely injured, defined as sustaining a polytrauma or severe monotrauma (ISS > 15) or being killed, was conducted over 14 months in a large study region in Germany. Data on injuries, pre-clinical and clinical care, crash circumstances and vehicle damage were obtained both prospectively and retrospectively from trauma centers, dispatch centers, police and fire departments. 149 patients with a polytrauma and eight with a severe monotrauma were recorded altogether. 22 patients died in hospital. Another 76 victims had deceased at the accident scene. In 2008, 49 % of patients treated with life-threatening injuries were car or van occupants, 21 % motorcyclists, 18 % cyclists and 10 % pedestrians. Among fatalities at the scene, vehicle occupants constituted an even larger portion. The number of road users with life-threatening trauma in the region was extrapolated to the German situation. It suggests that 10 % among the "seriously injured" as defined in national accident statistics are surviving accident victims with a polytrauma or severe monotrauma.
Bicyclists are minimally or unprotected road users. Their vulnerability results in a high injury risk despite their relatively low own speed. However, the actual injury situation of bicyclists has not been investigated very well so far. The purpose of this study was to analyze the actual injury situation of bicyclists in Germany to create a basis for effective preventive measures. Technical and medical data were prospectively collected shortly after the accident at the accident scenes and medical institutions providing care for the injured. Data of injured bicyclists from 1985 to 2003 were analyzed for the following parameters: collision opponent, collision type, collision speed (km/h), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), Maximum AIS (MAIS), incidence of polytrauma (Injury Severity Score >16), incidence of death (death before end of first hospital stay). 4,264 injured bicyclists were included. 55% were male and 45% female. The age was grouped to preschool age in 0.9%, 6 to 12 years in 10.8%, 13 to 17 years in 10.4%, 18 to 64 years in 64.7%, and over 64 years in 13.2%. The MAIS was 1 in 78.8%, 2 in 17.0%, 3 in 3.0%, 4 in 0.6%, 5 in 0.4%, and 6 in 0.2%. The incidence of polytrauma was 0.9%, and the incidence of death was 0.5%. The incidence of injuries to different body regions was as follows: head, 47.8%; neck, 5.2%, thorax, 21%; upper extremities, 46.3%; abdomen, 5.8%; pelvis, 11.5%, lower extremities, 62.1%. The accident location was urban in 95.2%, and rural in 4.8%. The accidents happened during daylight in 82.4%, during night in 12.2%, and during dawn/dusk in 5.3%. The road situation was as follows: straight, 27.3%; bend, 3.0%; junction, 32.0%; crossing, 26.4%; gate, 5.9%; others, 5.4%. The collision opponents were cars in 65.8%, trucks in 7.2%, bicycles in 7.4%, standing objects in 8.8%, multiple objects in 4.3%, and others in 6.5%. The collision speed was grouped <31 in 77.9%, 31-50 in 4.9%, 51-70 in 3.7%, and >70 in 1.5%. The helmet use rate was 1.5%. 68% of the registered head injuries were located in the effective helmet protection area. In bicyclists, head and extremities are at high risk for injuries. The helmet use rate is unsatisfactorily low. Remarkably, two thirds of the head injuries could have been prevented by helmets. Accidents are concentrated to crossings, junctions and gates. A significant lower mean injury severity was observed in victims using separate bicycle lanes. These results do strongly support the extension or addition of bicycle lanes and their consequent use. However, the lanes are frequently interrupted at crossings and junctions. This emphasizes also the important endangering of bicyclists coming from crossings, junctions and gates, i.e. all situations in which contact of bicyclists to motorized vehicles is possible. Redesigning junctions and bicycle traffic lanes to minimize the possibility of this dangerous contact would be preventive measures. A more consequent helmet use and use and an extension of bicycle paths for a better separation of bicyclists and motorized vehicle would be simple but very effective preventive measures.
Rear-end collisions are the most frequent same and opposite-direction crashes. Common causes include momentary inattention, inadequate speed or inadequate distance. While most rear-end collisions in urban traffic only result in vehicle damage or slight injuries, rear-end collisions outside built-up areas or on motorways usually cause fatal or serious injuries. Driver assistance systems that detect dangerous situations in the longitudinal vehicle direction are therefore an essential safety plus. In view of this, for ADAC, systems that alert drivers to dangerous situations and initiate autonomous braking complement ESC as one of the most important active safety features in modern vehicles. The aim of ADAC is to provide consumers with technical advice and competent information about the systems available on the market. Reliable comparative tests that are based on standardised test criteria may provide motorists with important information and help them make a buying decision. In addition, they raise consumer awareness of the systems and speed up their market penetration. The assessment must focus on as many aspects of effectiveness as possible and include not only autonomous braking but also collision warning and autonomous brake assist. The work of the ADAC accident research is the development of the testing scenarios with direct link to accident situations and the identification of useful test criteria for testing.
Small overlap frontal crashes are defined by a damage pattern with most of the vehicle deformation concentrated outboard of the main longitudinal structures. These crashes are prominent among frontal crashes resulting in serious and fatal injuries, even among vehicles that perform well in regulatory and consumer information crash tests. One of the critical aspects of understanding these crashes is knowing the crash speeds that cause the types of damage associated with serious injuries. Laboratory crash tests were conducted using 12 vehicles in three small overlap test conditions: pole, vehicle-to-vehicle collinear, and vehicle-to-vehicle oblique (15-degree striking angle). Field reconstruction techniques were used to estimate the delta V for each vehicle, and these results were compared with actual delta V values based on vehicle accelerometer data. Estimated delta Vs were 50% lower than actual values. Velocity change estimates for small overlap frontal crashes in databases such as NASS-CDS significantly underestimate actual values.
Ausgangspunkt der in diesem Bericht dargestellten Forschungsarbeiten und -ergebnisse ist ein Untersuchungsauftrag des Bundesverkehrsministeriums an die BASt zur Frage, inwieweit das Telefonieren am Steuer unfallursächlich ist. Hierzu fand im Jahr 1996 bei der polizeilichen Unfallaufnahme eine Zusatzerhebung in Rheinland-Pfalz und ausgewählten Gebieten Bayerns statt. Parallel führte die BASt eine repräsentative Bevölkerungsbefragung von Pkw-Fahrern in Deutschland durch. Zur Anlehnung der durchgeführten Analysen an den aktuellen Forschungsstand wird ein Überblick über die verfügbare Literatur mit Darstellung bisheriger Studien über die Auswirkungen des Telefonierens am Steuer gegeben. Auch auf die rechtlichen Regelungen anderer Länder wird eingegangen. Da für Pkw und Fahrzeuge des Schwerverkehrs unterschiedliche Bedingungen für Verkehrsteilnahme, Fahrzeugnutzung und Ausstattung mit Telefon bestehen, werden beide Gruppen einer getrennten Analyse unterzogen. Rund 8 Prozent der Pkw-Fahrer führten 1996 laut Befragung ein Telefon mit sich, darunter 30 Prozent mit Freisprecheinrichtung: Fahrer mit Telefon weisen im Mittel überdurchschnittliche Fahrleistungen auf. Der mit Fahrleistungen gewichtete Verkehrsanteil der Pkw-Fahrer mit Telefon liegt bei 15 Prozent. Im ausgewerteten Unfallgeschehen wurde bei 5,6 Prozent der an Unfällen mit Personenschaden (UPS) und bei 6,8 Prozent der an Unfällen mit schwerwiegendem Sachschaden (USS) beteiligten Pkw-Fahrer ein Telefon festgestellt, hiervon verfügten 33,2 Prozent über eine Freisprechmöglichkeit. Es kann nicht auf ein insgesamt höheres Unfallrisiko der Pkw-Fahrer mit Telefon geschlossen werden. Die Unfalldaten zeigen, dass Telefone in überwiegend leistungsstärkeren, relativ neuen Pkw genutzt werden. Dies korrespondiert mit den Ergebnissen der Befragung. Unfallstrukturbetrachtungen beziehen sich auf Pkw und Hauptverursacher mit/ohne Telefon, um eine mögliche Unfallursächlichkeit des Telefonierens für bestimmte Ortslagen, Unfalltypen, Unfallarten, Unfallursachen und Unfallzeitpunkte herauszufiltern. Pkw mit Telefon sind analog zur Fahrzeugnutzung dieser Gruppe zu wesentlich höherem Anteil auf den BAB unfallverwickelt als Pkw ohne Telefon. Auffällige Befunde ergeben sich bei Auffahrunfällen innerorts: Fahrzeuge ohne Freisprecheinrichtung sind innerorts deutlich häufiger an Auffahrunfällen beteiligt als Fahrzeuge mit Freisprecheinrichtung und Pkw ohne Telefon. Dies gilt verstärkt bei weniger leistungsstarken Fahrzeugen. Telefonieren war nach den Feststellungen der Polizei bei etwa jedem zweiten Unfall, bei dem telefoniert wurde, mit unfallursächlich. Die Fahrzeuge des Schwerverkehrs, bei denen die Erreichbarkeit der Berufskraftfahrer häufig als erforderlich gilt, haben eine deutlich höhere Telefonausstattung als Pkw, mit großen Unterschieden zwischen den Fahrzeuggruppen. Die Unfallstruktur der Hauptverursacher mit Telefon zeigt Auffälligkeiten auf Landstraßen und insbesondere BAB. Bei den meisten Schwerverkehrsunfällen, bei denen die Polizei angab, dass (vermutlich) telefoniert wurde, war das Telefonieren mit ursächlich.
Since 2008, the authors inspected fatal traffic accidents on the spot every year, with the cooperation of Toyota police station in Aichi pref. In the jurisdiction, numbers of fatal accidents were 18 in 2008, 12 in 2009, 14 accidents in 2010, and 16 in 2011. We here report the results of our analysis of information obtained by detailed inspection for those that occurred from 2008 to 2010. We focused on vehicle-to-pedestrian accidents, which accounted for about 45% of all accidents in 2008. Because many accidents occurred on residential roads not far from pedestrians" homes, it was revealed that the decrease of the collision speed by traffic calming such as humps and zone speed management, was highly effective. On the other hand, pedestrian detection technologies seemed to be also effective as a countermeasure on vehicle side. Every pedestrian position against a vehicle was clarified and TTC (Time to Collision) was calculated provisionally. Pedestrian accidents in intersections were also examined. Among the intersection pedestrian accidents within the jurisdiction, compared with the national average in Japan, the ratio of intersections without a signal and the ratio without a pedestrian crossing were high. According to the comparison of the Japanese traffic accident patterns between 2001 and 2008, pedestrian accidents during turning right and turning left did not decrease much. For elderly drivers, these accidents occurred very often. Finally, single vehicle accidents were analysed with the accident pattern analysis methods used above. There were high numbers of single vehicle accidents against object on single roads. Although fatal accidents against guardrails decreased, the numbers of fatal accidents against a utility pole and a sign pole were nearly constant. As for the impact with narrow width objects such as utility poles, the fatality rate was very high, and countermeasures of both road infrastructure and vehicles seem to be effective.
Im vorliegenden Bericht wird das Unfallgeschehen beim Gefahrguttransport analysiert. Grundlage der Untersuchung sind die Einzeldaten der amtlichen Straßenverkehrsunfallstatistik, die der BASt für Zwecke der Unfallforschung übermittelt werden. Untersucht werden die Unfalldaten der Jahre 1992 bis 1995. Ein Unfall wird als Gefahrgutunfall definiert, wenn im verfügbaren Datenmaterial der Unfälle mit Personenschaden bei mindestens einem Güterkraftfahrzeug mindestens zu einem gefahrgutspezifischen Merkmal eine Angabe vorliegt. Es erfolgt eine detaillierte Betrachtung der Struktur der Unfälle mit Personenschaden beim Transport gefährlicher Güter anhand wichtiger Unfall- und Beteiligtenmerkmale. Weiterhin werden spezifische Unterschiede zwischen dem Unfallgeschehen von Güterkraftfahrzeugen beim Gefahrguttransport und dem Gütertransport insgesamt herausgearbeitet. Beim Gefahrguttransport hat sich während des Untersuchungszeitraums die Zahl der Unfälle mit Personenschaden pro Jahr deutlich verringert. Unter der Voraussetzung, dass die Dunkelziffer und Qualität der Unfalldaten im Betrachtungszeitraum annähernd konstant geblieben ist, kann auf einen Rückgang der Unfälle beim Transport gefährlicher Güter geschlossen werden. Im Vergleich zum Unfallgeschehen des allgemeinen Güterverkehrs auf der Straße sind Unfälle beim Transport gefährlicher Güter seltene Ereignisse. "Nur" rund 8 von 1.000 Unfällen mit Personenschaden, an denen Güterkraftfahrzeuge beteiligt waren, wurden nach der vorliegenden Definition als Gefahrgutunfall eingestuft. Die Folgen dieser Unfälle sind jedoch deutlich schwerer. Im Mittel wurden bei 1.000 Unfällen mit Personenschaden beim Gefahrguttransport 69 Personen und beim Güterverkehr insgesamt 46 Personen getötet. Dabei hat jedoch das transportierte Gefahrgut bei 92 Prozent der betrachteten Unfälle nicht unmittelbar zu der deutlich höheren Unfallschwere beigetragen, da es "nur" bei 8 Prozent der Unfälle zu einem Austritt von Gefahrgut kam. Die entstandenen volkswirtschaftlichen Kosten liegen bei den Personenschäden um 40 Prozent und bei den Primär-Sachschäden um das Dreifache über den mittleren Kosten eines Unfalls im allgemeinen Güterverkehr. Sekundär-Sachschäden, das sind überwiegend die durch das Gefahrgut verursachten Langzeitschäden, konnten bei dieser Untersuchung nicht ermittelt werden, da entsprechende Informationen nicht vorlagen. Eine frühere BASt-Untersuchung (PÖPPEL, KÜHNEN; 1993) hat aber gezeigt, dass Sekundär-Sachschäden - bei den damals untersuchten Tankfahrzeugunfällen - nochmals bis zu etwa 40 Prozent höher liegen als Primär-Sachschäden.
In Germany, in-depth accident investigations are carried out in the Hannover area since 1973. In 1999 a second region was added with surveys in Dresden and the surrounding area. Internationally, the acronym GIDAS (German In-Depth Accident Study) is commonly used for these surveys. Compared to many other countries, the sample sizes of the GIDAS surveys are much larger. The goal is to collect 1.000 accidents involving personal injuries per year and region. Data collection takes place by using a sampling procedure, which can be interpreted as a two-stage process with time intervals as primary units and accidents as secondary units. An important question is, to what extend these samples are representative for the target population from which they are drawn. Analyses show, for example, that accidents with persons killed or seriously injured are overrepresented in the samples compared to accidents with slightly injured persons. This means, that these data are subject to biases due to uncontrolled variation of sample inclusion probability. Therefore, appropriate weighting and expansion methods have to be applied in order to adjust or correct for these biases. The contribution describes the statistical and methodological principles underlying the GIDAS surveys with respect to sampling procedure, data collection and expansion. In addition, some suggestions regarding potential improvements of study design are made from a methodological point of view.
Introduction: Spine injuries pose a considerable risk to life and quality of life. The total number of road deaths in developed countries has markedly decreased, e.g. in Germany from over 20000 in 1970 to less than 4000 in 2010, but little is known how this is reflected in the burden of spine fractures of motor vehicle users. In this study, we aimed to show the actual incidence of spine injuries among drivers and front passengers and elucidate possible dependencies between crash mechanisms and types of injuries.