81 Unfallstatistik
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (86)
- Buch (Monographie) (13)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (3)
- Bericht (1)
- Arbeitspapier (1)
Schlagworte
- Conference (82)
- Konferenz (82)
- Accident (71)
- Unfall (70)
- Statistics (44)
- Statistik (44)
- Germany (42)
- Deutschland (41)
- Injury (36)
- Fatality (35)
Institut
- Sonstige (104) (entfernen)
Bei Straßenverkehrsunfällen werden volkswirtschaftliche Ressourcen vernichtet und die Leistungsfähigkeit des Wirtschaftssystems entsprechend beeinträchtigt. Die Bewertung der volkswirtschaftlichen Schäden ist unerlässlich, um Maßnahmen zur Verringerung von Straßenverkehrsunfällen beurteilen zu können. Das Bewertungsverfahren zur Ermittlung der volkswirtschaftlichen Kosten durch Straßenverkehrsunfälle wurde in den letzten Jahren sowohl für Personen- als auch für Sachschäden überarbeitet. Mit dem neuen Verfahren wurde das Unfallgeschehen von 1995 bis 1998 bewertet. Die Entwicklung der Unfallkosten zeigt, dass eine erfolgreiche Verkehrssicherheitspolitik zu einer erheblichen Kostenentlastung der Volkswirtschaft und entsprechender Steigerung der Lebensqualität beitragen kann. Allein im betrachteten Zeitraum von 4 Jahren haben Straßenverkehrsunfälle volkswirtschaftliche Kosten in Höhe von fast 280 Milliarden DM verursacht. Diese Kosten sind ein Beleg dafür, dass die Verbesserung der Verkehrssicherheit eine verkehrspolitische Daueraufgabe ersten Ranges bleibt. Gleichzeitig wurden nach Ortslagen differenzierte Unfallkostensätze ermittelt, die als Eingangsdaten für gesamtwirtschaftliche Wirtschaftlichkeitsanalysen von Straßenverkehrsmaßnahmen - zum Beispiel nach den "Empfehlungen für Wirtschaftlichkeitsuntersuchungen von Straßen" (EWS 97) - dienen.
The purpose of this study was to analyse the actual injury situation of bicyclists regarding accidents involving more than one bicyclist. Bicyclists were included in a medical and technical analysis to create a basis for preventive measures and discovered repeating accident patterns and circumstances such as daytime, environment, helmet use rate. Technical and medical data were collected at the scene, shortly after accident. The population was compared focusing on bicycle versus bicycle accidents. Technical analysis included speed at crash, type of collision, impact angle, environment, used lane and relative velocity. Medical analysis included injury pattern and severity (AIS, ISS). Included were 578 injured bicyclists in 289 accidents from years 1999 to 2008, 61 percent were male (n=350) and 39 percent female (n=228). Sixty-seven percent ranged between 18 to 64 years of age, twelve percent each between 13 to 17 years of age and older than 65 years, eight percent between 6 to 12 years and one percent between 2 to 5 years.. Crashes took place in urban areas in 92 percent, in rural areas in 8 percent. Weather conditions were dry lanes in 97 percent and wet conditions in 3 percent. Eighty-three percent of all accidents happened during daytime, ten percent during night, and seven percent during dawn. The helmet use rate was only 7,5 percent in all involved bicyclists. The mean Maximum Abbreviated injury scale, Injury severity score was 1,31. Bicyclists are still minimally- or unprotected road users. The helmet use rate is unsatisfactorily low. The incidence of bicycle to bicycle crashes is high. Most of these accidents take place in urban areas. The level and pattern of injuries is moderate. Most of the more severe injuries occur to the head and could have been avoided by frequent helmet use.
The GIDAS-investigation team of Dresden (VUFO) has documented more than 11.500 accidents since 1999. The documentation of the accident includes beside vehicle-, injury- and environmental-data very detailed reconstruction data. Within this accident investigation the VUFO began to record the skid resistance of the accident site in 2009. The measurements are divided in macro- and microroughness (Sand depth method and Portable Skid Resistance Tester-SRT-by Munro-Stanley London-©). Both methods are used to determine the skid resistance for more than 1000 passenger cars. The aim of the present study is to find out a relationship between the measured skid resistance, the road conditions and the friction coefficient, which is used to calculate the maximum accelerations and decelerations during a reconstruction of an accident. Basic approach to convert the SRT-value into the friction coefficient is the calculation of the theoretical absorbed energy of the spring rubber system of the swinging arm of lever. This absorbed energy is used to get the friction coefficient by using the equations for the work of friction. To consider the road-behavior, in correlation to the friction coefficient, the results will be merged with existing literature. Last step for this study will be a comparison between actual used friction coefficients all over the GIDAS-database and the theoretical results. The study shows, if it is possible to use the SRT-Measurement for the estimation of a friction coefficient for the reconstruction of a traffic accident. As expected, the GIDAS-Database and the additional measurement of the roughness of the road directly on the spot are an enormous useful dataset.
Causation patterns and data collection blind spots for fatal intersection accidents in Norway
(2010)
Norwegian fatal intersection accidents from the years 2005-2007 were analysed to identify any causation patterns among their underlying contributing factors, and also to evaluate whether the data collection and documentation procedures used by the Norwegian in-depth investigation teams produces the information necessary to perform causation pattern analysis. A total of 28 fatal accidents were analysed. Details on crash contributing factors for each driver in each crash were first coded using the Driving Reliability and Error Analysis Method (DREAM), and then aggregated based on whether the driver was going straight or turning. Analysis results indicate that turning drivers to a large extent are faced with perception difficulties and unexpected behaviour from the primary conflict vehicle, while at the same time trying to negotiate a demanding traffic situation. Drivers going straight on the other hand have less perception difficulties. Instead, their main problem is that they largely expect turning drivers to yield. When this assumption is violated, they are either slow to react or do not react at all. Contributing factors often pointed to in literature, e.g. high speed, drugs and/or alcohol and inadequate driver training, played a role in 12 of 28 accidents. While this confirms their prevalence, it also indicates that most drivers end up in these situations due to combinations of less auspicious contributing factors. In terms of data collection and documentation, information on blunt end factors (those more distant in time/space, yet important for the development of events) was more limited than information on sharp end factors (those close in time/space to the crash). A possible explanation is that analysts may view some blunt end factors as event circumstances rather than contributing factors in themselves, and therefore do not report them. There was also an asymmetry in terms of reported obstructions to view due to signposts and vegetation. While frequently reported as contributing for turning drivers, they were rarely reported as contributing for their counterparts in the same accidents. This probably reflects an involuntary focus of the analyst on identifying contributing factors for the driver legally held liable, while less attention is paid to the driver judged not at fault. Since who to blame often is irrelevant from a countermeasure development point of view, this underlying investigator mindset needs addressing to avoid future bias in crash investigation reports.
This paper uses the national accident statistics of Great Britain to evaluate the effectiveness of Electronic Stability Control Systems (ESC) to reduce crash involvement rates. The crash experience of 8,951 cars is analysed and compared to a closely matching set of non-ESC cars using case-control methods. This is one of the largest ESC samples analysed to date. Overall the cars with ESC are involved in 3% fewer crashes although the effectiveness is substantially higher under conditions of adverse road friction. ESC equipped cars are involved in 15% fewer fatal crashes although this reduction represents the combined effect of ESC and passive safety improvements.
One goal of the assessment of the crashworthiness of passenger cars is to characterize the potential of injury outcome to occupants of cars involved in an accident. This can be achieved by the help of an index that puts the number of injured occupants of passenger cars in relation to the number of cars involved in an accident. As a consequence, this index decreases with a lower potential of injury and rises with a higher number of injuries while assuming a fixed number of accidents. Another index is introduced that uses an economical weighting of each injury level. The consequential injury costs are calculated using the average economical costs for lightly, severely and fatally injured persons. The calculation of the safety indices is based on an anonymized sample of accident data provided by the Federal Statistical Office. An index of Mercedes passenger car drivers depending on the year of registration between 1991 and 2006 is compared to the index of drivers of cars of other makes within the same range of registration years.
In recent years the boundaries between active and passive safety blurred more and more. Passive safety in the traditional term includes all safety aspects to prevent occupants to be injured or at least injury severity should be reduced. Passive Safety starts with the collision (first vehicle contact) and ends with rescue (open vehicle doors). Within this phase the occupant has to be protected by the passenger compartment whereby no intrusion should occur. Active safety on the other side was developed to interact prior to the collision whereby the goal is to prevent accidents. The extensive interaction between active and passive safety led to the terminologies "Primary" and "Secondary" safety whereas the expression Integrated Safety Concept was generated. Within this study the most well documented single vehicle accidents with cars not equipped with ESP were identified from the PENDANT database and reconstructed. Additional cases were found in the database ZEDATU of TU Graz. In comparison each case was simulated with the assumption that the cars were equipped with ESP. The differences regarding accident avoidance or crash severity as well as reduction of injury risk were analysed.
Accidents involving two wheels vehicles represent one of the more important types of accidents in Europe. These accidents are usually not easy to reconstruct specially for the analysis of the injuries and its correlation with accident dynamics and evidences. Different methodologies are applied in this work for the reconstruction of two wheeler accidents, especially accident involving motorcycles. From the typologies of road evidences like skid marks, to the use of Pc-Crash and the use of Madymo models, different reconstruction of real accidents are presented. One of the questions that sometimes arise for legal purposes when some type of head injuries arise is if the occupant was wearing or not a helmet. The correlation of head injuries with the use of the helmet is a very important issue, therefore an important legal aspect. One of the key questions for the reconstructions that is difficult to analyze, is if the vehicle occupant, was or not, wearing the helmet. Based on the previously collected information, a generic model of a helmet was developed on CAD 3D, followed by its conversion into finite elements, all in order to perform impact tests using the Madymo software that would help improve the helmet- safety, but that also can be used as a tool in accident reconstruction.
Crash involvement studies using routine accident and exposure data : a case for case-control designs
(2009)
Fortunately, accident involvement is a rare event: the chance of an individual road user trip to end up in a crash is close to zero. Thus, according to general epidemiological principles one can expect the case-control study design to be especially suitable for quantifying the relative risk (odds ratio) of accident involvement of road users with a certain risk factor as compared to road users that do not have this characteristic. Ideally, of course, the database for such a case-control study should be established by drawing two independent random samples of cases (accidental units) and controls (nonaccidental units), respectively. If, however, special data collection is not an option, it is nevertheless possible to analyze routine accident and exposure data under a case-control design in order to fully exploit the information contained in already existing databases. As a prerequisite, accident and exposure data from different sources are to be combined in a single file of micro or grouped data in a way consistent with the case-control study design. Among other things, the proposed methodological approach offers the possibility to use in-depth data of the GIDAS type also in investigations of active vehicle safety by combining this data with appropriate vehicle trip data collected in mobility surveys.
The Powered Two Wheelers (PTWs) accidents constitute one of the road safety targets in Europe. PTWs users' fatalities represent 15% of EU road fatalities, having increased the last few years, which is quite opposite than other road users casualties. To reduce PTW accidents is necessary to know which the accident causations are from different points of view (human factor, vehicle characteristics, environment, type of accident, situation, etc.). In TRACE project ("Traffic Accident Causation in Europe", under the European Commission 6th Framework Program, 2006-2008,) a specific task was focused on PTW users point of view, analyzing extensive databases to locate the main accident configurations (type of accident, severity, frequency), and an in-depth database to obtain the causation factors, the risk factors for each configuration founded in the extensive databases analysis and the variables associated to each causation factor in the PTW configurations.
The SafetyNet project was formulated in part to address the need for safety oriented European road accident data. One of the main tasks included within the project was the development of a methodology for better understanding of accident causation together with the development of an associated database involving data obtained from on-scene or "nearly onscene" accident investigations. Information from these investigations was complemented by data from follow-up interviews with crash participants to determine critical events and contributory factors to the accident occurrence. A method for classification of accident contributing factors, known as DREAM 3.0, was developed and tested in conjunction with the SafetyNet activities. Collection of data and case analysis for some 1 000 individual crashes have recently been completed and inserted into the database and therefore aggregation analyses of the data are now being undertaken. This paper describes the methodology development, an overview of the database and the initial aggregation analyses.
Sowohl die Zahl der im Straßenverkehr Getöteten wie auch die der Schwerverletzten sind nach Angaben der amtlichen Statistiken in Deutschland seit Jahren rückläufig. Die Gruppe der Schwerverletzten ist allerdings sehr heterogen und umfasst alle Unfallopfer, die für mindestens 24 Stunden in einem Krankenhaus behandelt wurden. Die vorliegende Untersuchung versucht, mit Hilfe von Daten des Traumaregisters der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU) die Frage zu beantworten, ob auch bei den besonders schwer verletzten Verkehrsunfallopfern ein Rückgang der Zahlen zu beobachten ist. Dazu wurden "schwerstverletzte" Patienten definiert als solche, die im Injury Severity Score (ISS) mindestens 9 Punkte erreicht haben und zudem intensivmedizinisch behandelt werden mussten. Der Zeitraum der Untersuchung umfasst zehn Jahre von 1997 bis 2006, der für einige Fragestellungen zusätzlich in zwei je 5-jährige Phasen unterteilt wurde. Ab 2002 (Phase 2) ist auch eine separate Auswertung für Fahrrad- und Motorradfahrer möglich. Die erste Fragestellung richtete sich auf die Veränderung der Anzahl schwerstverletzter Verkehrsunfallopfer über die Zeit. Dafür wurden die Daten von über 11.000 Patienten aus 67 verschiedenen Kliniken betrachtet. Pro Klinik wurde ein Durchschnittswert für die Anzahl von Verkehrsunfallopfern bestimmt, der dann mit der tatsächlich beobachteten Zahl verglichen wurde. Im Ergebnis zeigte sich, dass die relativen Abweichungen vom Durchschnitt insgesamt nur etwa -±10% betragen und dass kein deutlicher Trend einer Abnahme oder Zunahme der Schwerstverletztenzahlen in den vergangenen 10 Jahren erkennbar ist. In der zweiten Fragestellung wurde untersucht, ob und wie stark ein Rückgang der Letalität zu einem Anstieg der Schwerstverletztenzahlen geführt haben könnte. Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass in den letzten beiden Jahren deutlich weniger Patienten im Krankenhaus verstorben sind, als dies nach ihrer Prognose zu erwarten gewesen wäre. Dieser Rückgang der Letalitätsrate von absolut bis zu 5 (in 2006: Prognose 18% versus beobachtet 13%) trägt damit auch zu einer Zunahme bei der Zahl der Schwerstverletzten bei. Zur Abschätzung der Prognose wurde ein im Traumaregister entwickeltes und validiertes Scoresystem (RISC) eingesetzt. In der letzten Fragestellung sollte geklärt werden, ob sich das Verletzungsmuster bei den Schwerstverletzten in den vergangenen zehn Jahren und abhängig von der Art der Verkehrsteilnahme verändert hat. Insgesamt konnte gezeigt werden, dass der relative Anteil der Autofahrer rückläufig war, von 60% auf 50%. Bei den verletzten Körperregionen zeigt das Schädel-Hirn-Trauma den deutlichsten Rückgang von 69 % auf 60% insgesamt. Dieser Trend ist bei allen Verkehrsbeteiligten erkennbar. Lediglich Verletzungen der Wirbelsäule werden häufiger gesehen, was aber auch ein Effekt der verbesserten CT-Diagnostik sein kann, zum Beispiel beim Ganzkörper-CT. Je nach Art der Verkehrsbeteiligung zeigen sich sehr unterschiedliche Verletzungsmuster. Verletzungen des Kopfes sind bei Radfahrern und Fußgängern dominierend (über 70%), während Motorradfahrer hier die günstigsten Raten zeigen (45%). Motorrad- und Autofahrer haben die höchsten Raten für Verletzungen des Brustkorbs und im Bauchraum, bedingt durch die im Mittel höheren einwirkenden Kräfte auf den Körper. Insgesamt lassen sich die Daten des DGU-Traumaregisters gut nutzen, um typische Verletzungsmuster zu beschreiben und um relative Veränderungen bei der Zahl der Schwerstverletzten über die Zeit nachzuweisen. Beobachtungszeiträume von zehn Jahren und mehr, wie im vorliegenden Fall, ermöglichen auch aktuelle Trendaussagen. Epidemiologische Aussagen wie in den amtlichen Statistiken sind aber nur sehr eingeschränkt möglich, da das Traumaregister bisher nur auf freiwilliger Basis Daten sammelt.
Ziel des Forschungsprojektes war die quantitative Vorausschätzung des Straßenverkehrsunfallgeschehens der Jahre 2015 und 2020 in Deutschland mit Hilfe eines eigens entwickelten Prognoseverfahrens. Das Verfahren sollte eine größtmögliche Differenzierung des zukünftigen Unfallgeschehens nach Schweregrad, Art der Verkehrsbeteiligung und Alter der Verkehrsteilnehmer erlauben. Das Modell sollte grundsätzlich in der Lage sein, Ursache - Wirkungszusammenhänge differenzierter als in herkömmlichen Ansätzen der Zeitreihenanalyse und deren Trendfortschreibung abzubilden. Den Prognosehorizont bilden die Jahre 2015 und 2020. Im Rahmen des vorliegenden Projekts erfolgte für Deutschland erstmals eine Prognose der Unfall- und Verunglücktenzahlen über eine Risikoanalyse maßgebender Unfallkonstellationen. Dabei wurde sowohl nach Ortslagen, Unfallbeteiligten und Alter der Verkehrsteilnehmer unterschieden. Mit Hilfe des vorgestellten Prognosemodells lässt sich der künftige Grad der Straßenverkehrssicherheit differenziert beurteilen. Auswirkungen der sich ändernden Rahmenbedingungen auf das Unfallgeschehen werden sowohl auf der Ebene der Unfallentstehung als auch auf der Ebene der Unfallschwere berücksichtigt. Dabei kann insbesondere der Einfluss aus Demografie und sich verändernder Zugangsvoraussetzungen zu Verkehrsmitteln auf das Unfallgeschehen abgebildet werden. Der vorgestellte erste Entwicklungsstand des Modells bietet daher bereits sehr gute Möglichkeiten, Wirkungsanalysen bei veränderten Einflussgrößen durchzuführen. Das Unfallprognosemodell wurde modular aufgebaut. Dadurch konnte eine logische und hierarchische Modellstruktur realisiert werden. In der Folge werden die einzelnen Module im Gesamtmodell sequentiell durchlaufen, sind in sich geschlossen und folgen eigenen Berechnungsvorschriften. Eine Umsetzung des Modells erfolgte auf Basis verknüpfter Excel-Dateien mit Hilfe von VBA-Makros. Hierbei wurde auf eine stark getrennte Struktur der einzelnen Berechnungsschritte Wert gelegt, um die einzelnen Dateien übersichtlich und nachvollziehbar zu gestalten. Gleichzeitig erfüllt das Modell die Forderung einer größtmöglichen Variabilität. So können sowohl geänderte Eingangsdaten zugrundegelegt werden als auch die Auswahl der differenzierten Trendberechnung beliebig getroffen werden. Im Ergebnis ist auf Basis der getroffenen Annahmen, der historischen Entwicklung und der konstellationenfeinen Fortschreibung der Risikofaktoren ein deutlicher Rückgang der Unfall- und Verunglücktenzahlen in Deutschland für den Prognosezeitraum gegenüber 2006 zu erwarten. Bei den Unfällen mit Personenschaden ist bis 2020 mit einer Abnahme um nahezu 30 % zu rechnen, bei den Verunglückten kann von einer Reduzierung um 13 % ausgegangen werden. Die Zahl getöteter Personen sinkt dabei voraussichtlich von ca. 5.100 Personen (2006) auf 2.700 Personen (2020). In Bezug auf die Schwerverletzten ist im gleichen Zeitraum mit einem Rückgang um ca. 33.000 Personen zu rechnen (2006: 74.500 Personen). Ebenso sinkt gegenüber dem Analysejahr 2006 die Anzahl Leichtverletzter um etwa 6 % auf etwa 326.000 Personen. Die Rückgänge der Verunglücktenzahlen liegen zwischen 2006 und 2015 sowie zwischen 2015 und 2020 zahlenmäßig auf einem vergleichbaren Niveau (55.000 bzw. 58.000 V). Somit wird etwa die Hälfte der Gesamtrückgänge im Prognosezeitraum allein in den letzten fünf Jahren der insgesamt fünfzehnjährigen Zeitspanne erreicht.
Im Rahmen seiner Tätigkeit hat sich der Arbeitskreis "Unterhaltungs- und Betriebsdienst" der Forschungsgesellschaft für Straßen- und Verkehrswesen in den letzten Jahren wieder verstärkt dem Thema der von Dritten verursachten Unfälle mit Beteiligung des Unterhaltungs- und Betriebsdienstes auf Autobahnen gewidmet. Mit Hilfe der Erkenntnisse aus früheren Untersuchungen und der Auswertung von neueren Unfalldaten aus einer schweizerischen und einigen deutschen Straßenbauverwaltungen sollten vermutete Tendenzen überprüft und vorhandene Entwicklungen aufgezeigt werden. Eine Zunahme von Unfällen mit Personenschaden in den letzten Jahren war nicht zu erkennen, eher eine Stagnation der Unfallzahlen trotz steigendem Verkehrsaufkommens. Eine Betrachtung des individuellen Todesfallrisikos des Straßenbetriebsdienstpersonals, welches um ein Vielfaches größer ist als das anderer Berufsgruppen oder das der Verkehrsteilnehmer, zeigt allerdings die grundlegende Bedeutung der Problematik. In den Auswertungen lassen sich eine Reihe von häufig auftretenden Unfallmustern sowie einige Zusammenhänge mit dem Verkehrsgeschehen erkennen und daraus folgenden Ansätze zur Unfallvermeidung ableiten. Zukünftig sollen mit den Ergebnissen eine Sensibilisierung der Öffentlichkeit für die Gefährdung des Straßenbetriebspersonals erreicht und in weiteren Untersuchungen Möglichkeiten für eine Verbesserung der Absicherung von Arbeitsstellen erarbeitet werden.
The need for improved EU level accident information and data was identified in the EU White Paper on Transport Policy (2001)1 and detailed in the Road Safety Action Plan (2003)2. The plan specifies that the EC will develop a road safety observatory to coordinate data collection within an integrated framework.
Although the annual traffic accident statistics published by the national police is available in public, the detailed traffic accident data has not been released in Korea. Recently the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport recognized the importance of in-depth accident data to enhance road traffic safety and initiated a research project to establish a collection of the detailed accident data. The main objective of the project is a feasibility study to establish KIDAS (Korea In-Depth Accident Study). Within this project, three university hospitals which are located in mid-size cities have been selected to collect accident data. Annually, more than 500 cases of accidents have been collected from the in-patient's interviews and diagnosis. Unlike GIDAS (German In-Depth Accident Study), currently on-site investigation can"t be performed by the Korean police. The only available data is patient medical records, patient's description of accident circumstances and the damaged vehicle. Occasionally the police provide the accident investigation reports containing very brief information on accident causation and vehicle safety. In a first step, the concept of KIDAS is to adopt the format of iGLAD (Initiative for the Global Harmonization of Accident Data) for harmonization. Since the currently collected accident information is extremely limited compared with GIDAS, the other sources of data and calculations such as KNCAP vehicle data, pc-crash simulations, vehicle registration information, insurance company data are utilized to complete the iGLAD template. Results from KIDAS_iGLAD and the cases of assessment of active safety devices such as AEBS, ESC, and LDWS will be evaluated.
Estimation of the benefits for the UK for potential options to modify UNECE Regulation No. 95
(2010)
The side impact problem in Europe remains substantial. UK data shows that between 22% and 26% of car occupant casualties are involved in a side impact, but this rises to between 29% and 38% for those who are fatally injured. This indicates the more injurious nature of side impacts compared with frontal impacts. The European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) has performed work to address the side impact issue since 1979. As part of its continuing work, it has recently investigated potential options for regulatory changes to improve side impact protection in cars further. To support this work the UK undertook an analysis to estimate the benefit for potential options to modify UNECE Regulation 95. The analysis used the UK national STATS19 and detailed Co-operative Crash Injury Study (CCIS) accident databases. Of the potential options reviewed, it was found that the addition of a pole test offered the greatest benefit.
The primary goal of this investigation was to determine the relative risk of traffic accidents in students. In a two year period, a survey amongst 2,325 students was carried out, and 3,645 injuries sustained by students treated at our hospital were analyzed. Moped-riding in adolescents were associated with a 23.75-fold increased risk for injury as compared to biking. Children who ride bicycles have a 2.2-fold increased risk for an injury sustained by traffic accidents compared to pedestrians. None of 50 injured bicycle riders with helmet had an AIS for head injuries of more than 2. 24 of 233 injured bicycle drivers without helmet had an AIS for head injuries of more than 2. The use of a protective helmet significantly reduced the severity of head injuries. The level of awareness towards danger and a history of previous accidents correlate with the likelihood of future accidents. Due to the severity of traffic accidents, more adequate prevention measures (wearing of bicycle helmets and better education for moped riders) are urgently needed.
The paper gives an overview of the recent (mostly 2012) figures of killed bus/coach occupants (drivers and passengers) in 27 Member States of the European Union as reported by CARE. The Evolution of the figures of bus/coach occupants killed in road accidents urban, rural without motorway and on motorways from 1991 to 2010 in 15 Member States of the EU supplements this information. More detailed are the figures reported for Germany by the Federal Statistics. The paper displays long-term evaluations (1957 to 2012) for killed, seriously and slightly injured occupants in all kinds of buses/coaches. Midterm evaluations (1995 to 2012) of the figures of fatalities and casualties are displayed for different busses according to their identification of road using as coaches, urban buses, school buses, trolley buses and "other buses". To be able to compare the evolutions of the safety of vehicle occupants it is customary to use different risk indicators. Calculations and illustrations for three often used indicators with their development over time are given: fatalities, seriously injured and slightly injured per 100,000 vehicles registered, per 1 billion (109) vehicle-kilometres travelled and per 1 billion (109) person-kilometres. These indicators are shown for occupants of cars, goods vehicles and buses/coaches. For the period from 1957 until 2012 it is obvious, that for all three vehicle categories analysed there was a clear long-term trend towards more occupant safety in terms of casualties per vehicles registered and per vehicle mileage. This was most significant for car occupants but it can be seen for bus/coach occupants and goodsvehicle occupants as well. Figures of killed occupants and of casualties related to person-kilometres are calculated and displayed for the shorter period 1995 to 2012. Here it becomes obvious that the bus/coach is still the safest mode of transport for the occupants of road vehicles. Graphs for the casualty risk indices still show significantly higher risks for car occupants despite the corresponding curve moved sustainable downwards. It is remarkable, that the risks of being killed or injured for the occupants of urban buses is growing whereas the corresponding risk for the occupants of coaches in line traffic tends downwards. The article ends with a short comparison and discussion of the risk indicators which are actually published for the occupants (driver and passengers) of cars and the passengers of buses/coaches, railroads, trams and airplanes. The interpretation of such information depends on the perception and it seems that for a complete view not only one indicator should be used and the evolutions of the indicator values during longer periods (as displayed with examples in the paper) should also be taken into account.
Data concerning accidents involving personal injury which have been collected in the context of in-depth investigations on scene in the Hannover area since 1973 and in the Dresden area since 1999 represent an important basis for empirical traffic safety research. At national and international level various analyses and comparisons are carried out on the basis of "in-depth data" from the above mentioned investigations. In-depth data play a decisive role e.g. within the validation of EuroNCAP results on secondary safety (crashworthiness) of individual passenger car models. Thus, statistically sound methods of data analysis and population parameter estimation are of high importance. Since the 1st of August 1984 the "in-depth investigations on scene" in the Hannover area have been carried out according to a sampling plan developed by HAUTZINGER in the context of a research project on behalf of BASt. In the meantime a second region of in-depth investigation on scene was added with surveys in Dresden and the surrounding area. Internationally, the acronym GIDAS (German In-Depth Accident Study) is commonly used for the two above mentioned surveys. The objective of a current research project (topic of this contribution) is, among other things, to examine and adjust the previous weighting and expansion method for the two regional accident investigations to the current general conditions.