81 Unfallstatistik
From literature well-known analyzes on risks, hazards and causes of accidents of older drivers are amended by the present study in which a comparison of the specific features of accident causes of older car drivers (older than 60 years) and of younger car drivers (under 25 years) is conducted. Mainly the question is pursued if specific errors, mistakes and lapses are predominant in the two different age groups. The analysis system ACAS (Accident Causation Analysis System) used hereby consists of a sequential system of accident causation factors from the human, the technical and the infrastructural field, whereupon for this study the influence of the human features on the accident development in two different age groups is of interest. ACAS is both an accident model and an analysis and classification system, which describes the human participation factors of an accident and their causes in the temporal sequence (from the perceptibility to concrete action errors) taking into consideration the logical sequence of individual basic functions. In five steps (categories) of a logical and temporal sequence the hierarchical system makes human functions and processes as determinants of accident causes identifiable. The methodology specifically focuses on the use in so-called "In-Depth" and "On-Scene" investigation studies. With the help of the system for each accident participant one or more of five hypotheses of human cause factors are formed and then specified by appropriate verification criteria. These hypotheses in turn are further specified by indicators in such manner that the coding of the causation factors by a code system meets the needs of database processing and are accessible to a quantitative data analysis. The first results of the descriptive comparison of the two age groups concern mainly differences in the functional levels "information admission/perception" (where the elderly drivers have more difficulties than the young ones) and "information processing/evaluation" (where the younger drivers show more problems). Concerning the cognitive function of "planning" the group of younger drivers seems to be more often involved in an accident because of excessive speed.
The NHTSA-sponsored Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) has collected and analyzed crash, vehicle damage, and detailed injury data from over 4000 case occupants who were patients admitted to Level-I trauma centers following involvement in motor vehicle crashes. Since 2005, CIREN has used a methodology known as "BioTab" to analyze and document the causes of injuries resulting from passenger vehicle crashes. BioTab was developed to provide a complete evidenced-based method to describe and document injury causation from in-depth crash investigations with confidence levels assigned to the causes of injury based on the available evidence. This paper describes how the BioTab method is being used in CIREN to leverage the data collected from in-depth crash investigations, and particularly the detailed injury data available in CIREN, to develop evidence-based assessments of injury causation. CIREN case examples are provided to demonstrate the ability of the BioTab method to improve real-world crash/injury data assessment.
Gefragt ist nach alterstypischen Verkehrsverstößen, die bei Senioren auf eine zunehmende Verkehrsunsicherheit hinweisen. Die Studie basiert auf Stichprobendaten des Verkehrszentralregisters (VZR) von 350.000 Personen zwischen 35 und 84 Jahren, deren Verkehrsauffälligkeit im Anschluss an eine VZR-Eintragung über zwei Jahre beobachtet wurde. Tatsächlich lässt sich ein alterstypisches Fehlverhalten identifizieren: überwiegend Vorfahrtfehler sowie Fahrmanöver mit hohem Unfallanteil. Zwei gegenläufige Effekte halten sich etwa die Waage: Zum einen weisen Personen mit einem alterstypischen Fehlverhalten in den nachfolgenden Jahren im Vergleich zu Personen mit anderen Delikten erheblich weniger Verkehrsverstöße auf, zum anderen zeigen sie einen bedeutend höheren Unfallanteil an den (reduzierten) VZR-Eintragungen. Beide Effekte werden mit dem Alter prägnanter. Entsprechend dem "Risiko-Homöostase-Modell" versuchen Verkehrsteilnehmer, beide Komponenten im Gleichgewicht zu halten, was mit zunehmendem Alter aber nicht mehr allen gelingt. Diese Ergebnisse wie auch Zahlen der amtlichen Statistik zeigen gegenwärtig aber (noch) kein mit dem Alter bedrohlich steigendes Verkehrsrisiko an. Die vorhandenen Mechanismen " neben der Selbstbeschränkung der Fahrleistung auch die Entziehung der Fahrerlaubnis sowie der Verzicht " scheinen für die weitaus meisten Kraftfahrer auszureichen, ihr steigendes Risiko wegen höherer Fahrunsicherheit im Alter auszugleichen. Auf die Übrigen könnte aufgrund einer VZR-Eintragung mit einem alterstypischen Fehlverhalten durch Verwarnung und Aufklärung, und wenn dies nachweislich einer erneuten Verkehrsauffälligkeit nicht ausreicht, durch weitere Maßnahmen gezielt Einfluss genommen werden. Dies wäre ab einem Alter von 75 Jahren zu erwägen, doch schon ab 70 Jahren zu rechtfertigen. Eine Verwarnung würde ab 70 Jahren gegenwärtig maximal 30.000 Personen pro Jahr betreffen. Mit einer Wiederauffälligkeit innerhalb von zwei Jahren wäre im heutigen System " also ohne Verwarnung " in maximal 2.800 Fällen zu rechnen.
Die Unfallbeteiligung von Kleintransportern mit einem zulässigen Gesamtgewicht über 2,8 t bis 3,5 t hat in den vergangenen Jahren ähnlich wie der Bestand dieser Fahrzeuggruppe stark zugenommen. Das Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau- und Wohnungswesen (BMVBW) hat die Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt) beauftragt, das Unfallgeschehen von Kleintransportern zu untersuchen. Als Vergleichsgruppen wurden Kleintransporter bis 2,8 t und Lkw über 3,5 t bis 7,5 t, für einzelne Fragestellungen auch Pkw herangezogen. Die Arbeit zeigt, dass bis zum Jahr 2001 ein kontinuierlich starker Anstieg der Unfallbeteiligung von Kleintransportern über 2,8 t bis 3,5 t stattgefunden hat. Dieser starke Anstieg setzt sich danach bis zum Jahr 2003 nicht mehr fort. Fahrern von Kleintransportern über 2,8 t bis 3,5 t wurde durch die Polizei überdurchschnittlich häufig die Hauptschuld am Unfall zugewiesen.
Road safety is a major preoccupation of the European Commission and the road transport industry and depends on numerous significant factors. In order to improve road safety and to plan effective safety improvement actions for truck transport, we must first identify the problems to be addressed, i.e. what are the main causes of truck accidents. The ETAC project, initiated by the European Commission and the IRU, was launched in order to set up a heavy goods vehicle accident causation study across European countries to identify future actions which could contribute to the improvement of road safety. The results will be based on a detailed analysis of truck accident data collected in seven European countries according to a common methodology which has been elaborated through numerous national and European projects. This paper describes the common methodology used to collect the information on the scene of the accident and to analyse the data so that the reconstruction of the crash events may be carried out. CEESAR proposes a methodology using its experience gained from over 10 years of accident data collection. This methodology is based on an in-depth investigation of the parameters involved in-an accident and linked to the driver, the vehicle, the road and their environment. In-depth investigation requires accident investigator presence on the scene of the accident in order to collect volatile information such as marks on the road, weather conditions, visibility, state and equipment of the vehicle, driver interview. Later, passive and active information is gathered, either at the hospital for the driver, at the garage for the vehicle or on the spot for the road geometry. A reconstruction carried out with the help of specific software and the analysis of the data collected and calculated enables the identification of the main causes of the accident and the future actions to plan in order to improve road safety as regards truck traffic.
Unfortunately, there has been a high number of accident fatalities reported in the Czech Republic in recent years. There are many causes which have led to a growth in the number of road traffic accidents. Since 1990, traffic density has demonstrated an upward moving tendency, daily traffic-jams are on the increase in many cities and traffic capacity on roads and streets is not able to satisfy this increasing density. Moreover, many road users lack experience in terms of driving modern cars. The National Accident Study of the Czech Republic is based on the assumption that the year 2010 is considered as a pilot project with the testing operation of collecting and evaluating data from traffic accidents. From the beginning of 2011, a fully-functional structure of the Traffic Accident Research will be created and solid data generated. Based on this assumption, we hope to begin meaningful cooperation with foreign countries.
Car occupants have a high level of mortality in road accidents, since passenger cars are the prevalent mode of transport. In 2013, car occupant fatalities accounted for 45% of all road accident fatalities in the EU. The objective of this research is the analysis of basic road safety parameters related to car occupants in the European countries over a period of 10 years (2004-2013), through the exploitation of the EU CARE database with disaggregate data on road accidents. Data from the EU Injury Database for the period 2005 - 2008 are used to identify injury patterns, and additional insight into accident causation for car occupants is offered through the use of in-depth accident data from the EC SafetyNet project Accident Causation System (SNACS). The results of the analysis allow for a better understanding of the car occupants' safety situation in Europe, thus providing useful support to decision makers working for the improvement of road safety level in Europe.