81 Unfallstatistik
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (86)
- Buch (Monographie) (13)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (3)
- Bericht (1)
- Arbeitspapier (1)
Schlagworte
- Conference (82)
- Konferenz (82)
- Accident (71)
- Unfall (70)
- Statistics (44)
- Statistik (44)
- Germany (42)
- Deutschland (41)
- Injury (36)
- Fatality (35)
Institut
- Sonstige (104) (entfernen)
Pedestrian accidents are one of the major concerns related with road accidents around the world. Portugal has one of the highest rates of pedestrian fatalities in Europe. In this paper an overview conditions were the pedestrian accidents occurred in Portugal is presented. In the last years, a project related with the pedestrian accidents has run in Portugal for the period 2004-2006 where 603 people died, 2097 have been severely injured and about 17000 slightly injured. Within this project all the pedestrian accidents in this period have been analysed providing global information about a wide range of aspects, since location, driver and pedestrian characteristics, weather and road conditions, among others. In addition, 50 in-depth accidents have been investigated and the data collected according the Pendant methodology. For this in-depth methodology detailed information about the accident has been collected, including injuries, vehicle damage, road conditions and road user- behaviour and actions. An accident reconstruction has been carried for each case including the determination of the speeds and driver actions, and the analysis of the contributing factors for the accident. Depending of the accident complexity, different methodologies have been used to analyse these accident, from the classical analytical equations such as Simms and Woods, to the use of detailed computational pedestrian models as those included in the commercial software- PC-Crash-® or Madymo-®. Also one of the goals of our investigation is the development of multibody models and methodologies for the reconstruction of pedestrian accidents. Some of these tools integrated in the commercial software Cosmos Motion-® are presented. The advantages of the different approaches are compared and discussed for some of the accidents investigated. With these tools the impact speed can be determined from the projection distance with analytical tools or PC-Crash-®, but more complex tools should be used to determine speed from the injuries, what is especially important for fatal accidents. The influence of the vehicle geometry and stiffness characteristics is another aspect analysed, where the influence of the vehicle stiffness has been determined using a combined multibody-finite elements approach within the software Madymo-®.
Novice drivers are at high risk for crash involvement. We performed an analysis of causations, injury patterns and distributions of novice drivers in cars and on motorcycles in road traffic as a basis for proper measurements. Method Data of accident and hospital records of novice drivers (licence < 2 years) were analysed focusing the following parameters: injury type, localisation and mechanism, Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), maximum AIS (MAIS), delta-v, collision speed and other technical parameters and have been compared to those of experienced drivers. In 18352 accidents in the area of Hannover (years1985"2004), 2602 novice drivers and 18214 experienced drivers were recorded having an accident. Novice car drivers were more often and severe injured than experienced and on motorcycles the experienced riders were at higher risk. Novice drivers of both groups sustained more often extremity injuries. 4.5 % novice car drivers were not restraint compared to 3.7 % of the experienced drivers and 6.1 % novice motorcycle drivers did not wear a proper helmet (versus 6.5 %). Severe injuries sustained at a rate of 20 % at collision speeds below 30 km/h and in 80% at collision speeds above 50 km/h. Novice car drivers drove significant older cars. The risk profile of novice drivers is similar to those of drivers older than 65 years. Structural protection and special lectures like skidding courses could be proper remedial action next to harder punishment of violations.
It is well known that motorcycle riding is fascinating but quite more dangerous than for example car driving. In 2006, 5,091 persons were killed as victims of crashes occurring on public roads in Germany. 52% (2,683) were car occupants, 16% (793) motorcycle riders, 14% (711) pedestrians, 10% (486) bicycle riders, 5% (235) commercial vehicle occupants, 2% (107) riders of smaller powered two-wheelers, called "Mofa, Moped and Mokick". This shows that motorcycle riders recently are the second largest group of killed traffic participants in Germany. Latest information coming from the Federal Statistics predict for the year 2007 the figure of 4,958 killed road victims in total. This would be again a successful reduction (-133 killed persons or "2.6% compared to the year 2006). But the news coming from the Federal Statistics during the year 2007 and at the begin of 2008 did not always tell the same positive story. It is questioned whether the positive trend of substantially reduced figures of killed road user year by year will longer continue for Germany. That means it could be impossible to reach the ambitious target, set by the European Commission, to cut in half the figure of killed road users until the year 2010 " compared to the figure for the year 2001. It was reported that the group of 45 to 49 years old traffic participants (all traffic modes) is conspicuous with an increase of 30% up to 297 killed road users in total from January to August 2007. This increase can be ascribed in particular by an increase of killed motorcycle riders within this age group. Due to mild weather conditions in Germany in 2007 the season for motorcycle riding began relatively early and this may be a main reason for the increase of the figure of killed motorcycle riders by 16% from January to August 2007. With this background the accident occurrence of motorcycles became more and more essential. As part of the actual discussion about historical trends, recent emphases, causes and relevant structures of the events of motorcycle crashes it is evident, to have latest and carefully updated figures coming from both the Federal Statistics and In-depth studies. The paper will give a contribution to this using the German Federal Statistics and in-depth studies, for example GIDAS. Additional data coming from the DEKRA Motorcycle Accident Database as well as from literature are considered, too. The paper will help to describe the current situation of the accident involvement of motorcycles in Germany.
Side impacts, both nearside and farside, have been indicated by research to be responsible for a large proportion of serious injuries from road crashes. This study aimed to compare and contrast the characteristics of nearside and farside crashes in Australia, Germany and the U.S., using the ANCIS, GIDAS and NASS/CDS in-depth-databases, in order to establish the impact and injury severity associated with these crashes, and the types of injuries sustained. The analyses revealed some interesting similarities, as well as differences, between both nearside and farside crashes, and the emergent trends between the three investigated countries. More specifically, it was indicated that whilst the severity of injury sustained in nearside crashes was slightly greater overall than that found for farside crashes, careful consideration of struck and nonstruck side occupants must be made when considering aspects such as vehicle design and occupant protection.
Over the last decades the number of traffic accident fatalities on German roads decreased by 77% down to 4968 in the year 2007. This positive development is due to optimisations of vehicle safety, roads and infrastructure and medical rescue issues. Up to now mostly the optimisations of secondary safety measures lead to this effect on vehicle safety. Since some years more and more driver assistance systems are available and lead to a further reduction of all accidents. These new systems are often comfort systems and have not primarily been developed to increase vehicle safety. In contrast to secondary safety systems primary safety systems are able to mitigate and avoid accidents. So in the future it is important to estimate the benefit of these systems in reducing accident numbers as well. Current benefit estimation methods mostly focus on a single system only and not on the combination of systems. In this paper a new method for a multivariate benefit estimation based on real accident data is developed. The paper describes the basic method to estimate the benefit of primary and secondary safety systems in combination. With the presented method the benefit will not be overestimated as it would be by a simple addition of the benefits of single systems. The model will be validated by a multivariate prospective benefit estimation of different vehicle safety systems in comparison to single benefit estimations of the same systems. For this the German In-Depth Accident Database is used. The results show the importance to implement the interactions of safety systems in the estimation process and rate the overestimation by a simple addition of the single system benefits. The validation includes primary and secondary safety systems in combination. The validation is done using more than 3500 real accidents which were initiated by cars. This sample out of the GIDAS database is representative for the current accident situation in Germany. The paper shows the necessity of a multivariate estimation of the benefit for existing and future safety systems.
A lot of factors are related to a road traffic accident; particularly human factors such as road use characteristic, driving maneuver characteristic and safety attitude are the major ones. As a random factor is also included, so it is necessary to minimize the contribution of a random factor to identify human factors related to a road traffic accident. There are several standpoints for traffic accident analysis, such as vehicle-based, location-based and driver-based. And it is effective to analyze driver-based traffic accident data for discussion on the relation between human factors and accidents. An integrated traffic accident database system was developed for analysis considering driver- accident and violation records by ITARD, and several studies were carried out for the evaluation. Useful data for discussion on the relation between types of collision and traffic violations, and the effect of accident experience to the following accident were obtained.
In an on-going project since 2005, ADAC has been analyzing accidents documented by the ADAC air rescue service. The knowledge derived from real-life accidents serves as a basis for new test configurations and assessment criteria. In 2007, ADAC began looking into the feasibility of international data collection. The idea of Global Accident Prevention was born. Three European partner clubs have begun pioneering the project (ÖAMTC, ANWB, and RACC). The aim is to set up an international accident research network to provide a steady stream of information on road accidents. The FIA Foundation supports ADAC in developing and coordinating this initiative.
Gefragt ist nach alterstypischen Verkehrsverstößen, die bei Senioren auf eine zunehmende Verkehrsunsicherheit hinweisen. Die Studie basiert auf Stichprobendaten des Verkehrszentralregisters (VZR) von 350.000 Personen zwischen 35 und 84 Jahren, deren Verkehrsauffälligkeit im Anschluss an eine VZR-Eintragung über zwei Jahre beobachtet wurde. Tatsächlich lässt sich ein alterstypisches Fehlverhalten identifizieren: überwiegend Vorfahrtfehler sowie Fahrmanöver mit hohem Unfallanteil. Zwei gegenläufige Effekte halten sich etwa die Waage: Zum einen weisen Personen mit einem alterstypischen Fehlverhalten in den nachfolgenden Jahren im Vergleich zu Personen mit anderen Delikten erheblich weniger Verkehrsverstöße auf, zum anderen zeigen sie einen bedeutend höheren Unfallanteil an den (reduzierten) VZR-Eintragungen. Beide Effekte werden mit dem Alter prägnanter. Entsprechend dem "Risiko-Homöostase-Modell" versuchen Verkehrsteilnehmer, beide Komponenten im Gleichgewicht zu halten, was mit zunehmendem Alter aber nicht mehr allen gelingt. Diese Ergebnisse wie auch Zahlen der amtlichen Statistik zeigen gegenwärtig aber (noch) kein mit dem Alter bedrohlich steigendes Verkehrsrisiko an. Die vorhandenen Mechanismen " neben der Selbstbeschränkung der Fahrleistung auch die Entziehung der Fahrerlaubnis sowie der Verzicht " scheinen für die weitaus meisten Kraftfahrer auszureichen, ihr steigendes Risiko wegen höherer Fahrunsicherheit im Alter auszugleichen. Auf die Übrigen könnte aufgrund einer VZR-Eintragung mit einem alterstypischen Fehlverhalten durch Verwarnung und Aufklärung, und wenn dies nachweislich einer erneuten Verkehrsauffälligkeit nicht ausreicht, durch weitere Maßnahmen gezielt Einfluss genommen werden. Dies wäre ab einem Alter von 75 Jahren zu erwägen, doch schon ab 70 Jahren zu rechtfertigen. Eine Verwarnung würde ab 70 Jahren gegenwärtig maximal 30.000 Personen pro Jahr betreffen. Mit einer Wiederauffälligkeit innerhalb von zwei Jahren wäre im heutigen System " also ohne Verwarnung " in maximal 2.800 Fällen zu rechnen.
Auf der Grundlage von 951 Unfallprotokollen aus den Jahren 1997 bis 2005, bei denen Bedienstete, Fahrzeuge oder Geräte der Straßenbauverwaltungen in Arbeitsstellen kürzerer Dauer (AkD) auf Autobahnen zu Schaden kamen, wurden relevante Unfallmuster herausgearbeitet. So konnte im Wesentlichen der Lkw als Hauptunfallverursacher mit einem Anteil von knapp 60 % am Gesamtunfallaufkommen identifiziert werden. Hauptsächlich sind AkD bei Sperrung des rechten Fahrstreifens oder des Standstreifens betroffen. Ein "Anprall von hinten" auf dem rechten Fahrstreifen und ein "seitliches Streifen" auf dem Standstreifen von zum Beispiel Absperrtafeln oder Fahrzeugen treten mit etwa gleichen Anteilen am häufigsten auf. Ferner zeigen die Auswertungen, dass 2/3 aller Unfälle bei stationären AkD aufgetreten sind. Besonders auffällig ist, dass fast 80 % der verunglückten Mitarbeiter in ihrem Fahrzeug zu beklagen sind, nur ca. 20 % der Verunglückten waren beim Unfall außerhalb der Fahrzeuge. Beim Ein- und Aussteigen sind nur 4 Unfälle dokumentiert, diese allerdings mit je zwei Getöteten und Verletzten. Hinsichtlich der relevanten Unfallmuster wurden Maßnahmen abgeleitet, die zum einen die Unfallvermeidung und zum anderen die Unfallfolgenminderung zum Ziel haben. Im Rahmen einer Abschätzung wurden diese Maßnahmen bewertet und das erwartete Reduzierungspotenzial, einerseits bezogen auf die Anzahl vermeidbarer Unfälle und andererseits auf die Vermeidung von Verletzten, abgeleitet. Die Maßnahmen zur Erhöhung der Sicherheit des Betriebsdienstpersonals in AkD wurden hinsichtlich ihrer Wirkungsweise (optisch, akustisch, haptisch) auf den Verkehrsteilnehmer bewertet. Aufgrund der haptischen Wirkungsweise auf die Verkehrsteilnehmer beim Überfahren von Warnschwellen könnte bei stationären AkD ein relativ großes Reduzierungspotenzial zu erreichen sein. Gleiches gilt auch beim Einsatz des Unfall-Vorwarn-Systems (UVS). Das größte Potenzial zur Vermeidung von Unfällen stellt die aktive Fahrzeugsicherheit bei den unfallverursachenden Verkehrsteilnehmern dar. Würden Lkw, die als Hauptunfallverursacher in Relation zu ihrer Fahrzeuganzahl deutlich überrepräsentiert sind, mit radarbasierten Fahrgeschwindigkeitsreglern und Spurassistenzsystemen ausgestattet, könnte mit relativ geringem Aufwand ein hohes Maß an Sicherheit erzielt werden. Nutznießer einer solchen Pflichtausstattung wären darüber hinaus natürlich auch alle anderen Verkehrsteilnehmer, die bei Auffahrunfällen etc. davon profitieren würden. Auf die Installation von aktiven Sicherheitssystemen in Fahrzeuge kann nur durch entsprechende Vorgaben des Gesetzgebers Einfluss genommen werden. Empfehlenswert erscheint außerdem der Einsatz von Unfalldatenschreibern (UDS) inklusive der Dokumentation des Fahrerverhaltens wie zum Beispiel Festhalten des Lenkrades, um den Unfallhergang im Nachhinein rekonstruieren zu können. Insgesamt bieten passive Schutzsysteme in den Betriebsdienstfahrzeugen wegen der hohen Anteile von Verunglückten in den Fahrzeugen das größte Potenzial zur Vermeidung von Verletzungen. So könnten bereits durch die generelle Empfehlung zum Anlegen des Sicherheitsgurtes, auch bei der Absicherung von Arbeitsstellen oder Kurzfahrten, rund 30 % der zu erwartenden verletzten Fahrzeuginsassen vermieden werden. Zur Unterstreichung dieser Maßnahme sollte in entsprechenden Sicherheitsunterweisungen auf die Unfallgefahr hingewiesen werden. Diese sollten nicht nur das jederzeit gegenwärtige Gefährdungsrisiko ins Bewusstsein rufen, sondern auch die Eigensicherung, wie zum Beispiel erhöhte Aufmerksamkeit beim Ein- und Aussteigen, das Anlegen der Sicherheitsgurte, die korrekte Sitzposition sowie die persönliche Kopfstützeneinstellung betreffen. Ein sehr großes Vermeidungspotenzial insbesondere von HWS-Verletzungen bieten zum Beispiel Nackenairbags, aber auch Kopfstützensysteme in Verbindung mit Gurtstraffern mit zu erwartenden Reduzierungen von über 80 % der Verunglückten in den Fahrzeugen.
Untersuchungsgegenstand des Forschungsprojektes war die Überprüfung der aktuellen Grenzwertkriterien in Deutschland zur Identifizierung von Unfallhäufungen im Straßennetz. Nach Analyse des IST-Zustandes und der Bestimmung von Defiziten wurden alternative Grenzwertkriterien mit dem Ziel eines optimierten Einsatzes von Ressourcen im Bereich der Örtlichen Unfalluntersuchung überprüft. Auf Grundlage dieser Erkenntnisse erfolgte die Ableitung von Empfehlungen für zukünftige Grenzwertkriterien. Insgesamt wurden verschiedene Grenzwertkriterien getrennt für die Ortslagen innerorts, außerorts (ohne BAB) und Bundesautobahnen mittels einer umfangreichen Unfalldatenauswertung untersucht. Als Untersuchungsgebiete dienten außerorts Bereiche von Bundesländern (Sachsen) oder ganze Bundesländer (Bayern, Rheinland-Pfalz) sowie innerorts Städte verschiedener Größe (Großstädte über 100.000 E, Mittelstädte mit 30.000 bis 100.000 E sowie Durchfahrten von Ortschaften unter 30.000 E) aus vier Bundesländern. Die Untersuchungen lassen sich in folgenden Ergebnissen zusammenfassen:- Bei der Bestimmung der unfallauffälligen Stellen (UAS) mit gleichartigen Unfällen werden ortslagenunabhängig nahezu alle UAS durch die Gleichartigkeit des Unfalltyps identifiziert. Durch die Berücksichtigung von Unfallumständen wie z.B. die Verkehrsbeteiligung werden kaum zusätzliche Stellen erkannt. - Bei der parallelen Betrachtung der drei aktuellen Auswertungszeiträume (1-Jahreskarte, 3-Jahreskarte (P) und 3-Jahreskarte (SP)) wurde festgestellt, dass ein Großteil der UAS, die in der 3-Jahreskarte (SP) auffällig sind, auch in der 3-Jahreskarte (P) als auffällig identifiziert werden. - Die zeitliche Stabilität, d.h. das wiederholte Auftreten eines unfallauffälligen Bereiches in zwei oder mehr aufeinanderfolgenden Betrachtungszeiträumen, erreicht gemessen am Anteil an allen unfallauffälligen Bereichen in einem Ausgangszeitraum weder bei den UAS noch bei den unfallauffälligen Linien (UAL) eine zufriedenstellende Größenordnung. - Aus den unterschiedlichen Kriterien für die Optimierung von Grenzwerten nach einem ausgewogenen Verhältnis von Aufwand und Nutzen resultieren zum Teil unterschiedliche Ergebnisse. Bei der Empfehlung neuer Grenzwerte wurde darauf geachtet, dass bei Anwendung des Grenzwertes mindestens 10% des Gesamtunfallgeschehens im jeweiligen Betrachtungszeitraum bearbeitet werden. Die Empfehlungen beinhalten für die Identifizierung von unauffälligen Bereichen insbesondere Vorschläge zu geeigneten Betrachtungszeiträumen, räumlichen Abgrenzungen von unfallauffälligen Bereichen sowie der Angabe optimierter Grenzwerte differenziert nach Ortslage und Betrachtungszeitraum.
Empirical vehicle crashworthiness studies are usually based on national or in-depth traffic accident surveys: Data on accident-involved cars/drivers are analysed in order to quantify the chance of driver injury and to assess certain risk factors like car make and model. As the cars/drivers involved in the same accident form a "cluster", where the size of the cluster equals the number of accident-involved parties, traffic accident survey data are typical multi-level data with accidents as first-level or primary and cars/drivers as secondlevel or secondary units (car occupants in general are to be considered as third level units). Consequently, appropriate statistical multi-level models are to be used for driver injury risk estimation purposes as these models properly account for the cluster structure of traffic accident survey data. In recent years various types of regression models for clustered data have been developed in the statistical sciences. This paper presents multi-level statistical models, which are generally applicable for vehicle crashworthiness assessment in the sense that data on single and multiple car crashes can be analysed simultaneously. As a special case of multi-level modelling driver injury risk estimation based on paired-by-collision car/driver data is considered. It is demonstrated that assessment results may be seriously biased, if the cluster structure inherent in traffic accident survey data is erroneously ignored in the data analysis stage.
In the context of this study, different data sources for accident research were examined regarding their possible data access and evaluated concerning the individual quality and extent of the data. Analyses of accidents require detailed and comprehensive information in particular concerning vehicle damages, injury patterns and descriptions of the accident sequence. The police documentation supplies the basic accident statistics and is amended in the context of the forensic treatment by further information, e.g. by medical and technical appraisals and witness questionings. As a new approach to the data acquisition for the analysis of fatal traffic accidents, the information was made usable which was collected by the police and by the investigations of the public prosecutor. The best strategy for obtaining reliable, extensive and complete data consists of combining the information from these two sources: the very complete, but elementary statistic data of the Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Statistik (Lower Saxony State Authority of Statistics), based on the police documentation as well as the very extensive accident information resulting from the investigation documentation of the public prosecutor after conclusion of the procedure, the so-called Court Records. Of all 715 fatal traffic accidents, which happened in the year 2003 in the German State of Lower Saxony, 238 cases were selected by means of a statistically coincidental selective procedure based on a statistically representative manner (every third accident). These cases cover the investigation documents of the 11 responsible public prosecutor- offices, which were requested and evaluated while preserving the data security. Of the 238 cases 202 cases were available, which were individually coded and stored in a data base using 160 variables. Thus a data base of a sample of representative data for fatal accidents in Lower Saxony was set up. The data base contains extensive information concerning general accident data (35 variables), concerning road and road surface data (30 variables), concerning vehicle-specific data (68 variables) as well as concerning personal and injury data (27 variables).
Seit dem 1. Januar 1999 werden in Deutschland im Zentralen Fahrerlaubnisregister (ZFER) sämtliche erteilten Fahrerlaubnisse gespeichert. Informationen zum Fahrerlaubnisbestand bietet das ZFER aber nur begrenzt, denn der Wegfall von Fahrerlaubnissen durch Tod oder Wanderung kann nicht abgebildet werden. Außerdem fehlt ein Großteil der Alt-Fahrerlaubnisse. Aufgabe des Projektes war es daher, ein Verfahren zur jährlichen Fortschreibung einer Statistik zum Fahrerlaubnisbesitz für Deutschland zu entwickeln und für die Jahre 2002, 2003 und 2004 zu implementieren. Betrachtet werden neun nach Fahrzeugkategorien zusammengefasste Klassen (B/BE, C1/C1E,C/CE, D1/D1E/D/DE, A/A1 M, L, S (erst ab Fortschreibungsjahr 2005) und T. Der Anfangsbestand jeder Klasse für das Jahr 2002 wurde auf Basis der Ergebnisse empirischer Erhebungen und Informationen aus dem ZFER und unter Berücksichtigung geltender Übergangregelungen für Alt-Fahrerlaubnisse bestimmt. Die jährliche Fortschreibung in jeder Klasse geschieht in einem nach Geschlecht und Altersjahren differenzierten Bevölkerungskohortenmodell. Sie folgt dem konzeptionellen Grundgedanken, dass der Bestand zum Ende eines Jahres sich aus dem Bestand zum Ende des Vorjahres zuzüglich der Zugänge (Neuerteilungen, Zuwanderungen) und abzüglich der Abgänge (Todesfälle, Fortzüge) ergibt. In Abhängigkeit von den Regelungen jeder Fahrerlaubnisklasse (zum Beispiel Befristung der Geltungsdauer, Bestandsschutz für Alt-Fahrerlaubnisse) wurde die Konzeption entsprechend differenziert und angepasst. Das Ergebnis ist eine nach Alter, Geschlecht und Fahrerlaubnisklassen differenzierte Statistik, die die Zahl der Berechtigungen zum Führen eines Fahrzeugs ausweist, unabhängig davon in welchem Umfang von diesen Berechtigungen Gebrauch gemacht wird. Der vorliegende Bericht ist eine gekürzte Fassung des Forschungsberichtes. Während in letzterem die einzelnen Schritte der Erstellung der Fahrerlaubnisstatistik ausführlich und nachvollziehbar dargestellt sind, ist das Ziel des vorliegenden Berichtes eine ergebnisorientierte Darstellung der Fahrerlaubnisstatistik und ihrer Komponenten. Der ausführliche Bericht einschließlich eines gesonderten Tabellenanhangs liegen bei der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen vor.
Annually within the European Union, there are over 50,000 road accident fatalities and 2 million other casualties, of which the majority are either the occupants of cars or other road users in collision with a car. The European Commission now has competency for vehicle-based injury countermeasures through the Whole Vehicle Type Approval system. As a result, the Commission has recognised that casualty reduction strategies must be based on a full understanding of the real-world need under European conditions and that the effectiveness of vehicle countermeasures must be properly evaluated. The PENDANT study commenced in January 2003 in order to explore the possibility of developing a co-ordinated set of targeted, in-depth crash data resources to support European Union vehicle and road safety policy. Three main work activity areas (Work Packages) commenced to provide these resources. This paper describes some of the outcomes of Work Package 2 (WP2, In-depth Crash Investigations and Data Analysis). In WP2, some 1,100 investigations of crashes involving injured car occupants were conducted in eight EU countries to a common protocol based on that developed in the STAIRS programme. This paper describes the purposes, methodology and results of WP2. It is expected that the results will be used as a co-ordinated system to inform European vehicle safety policy in a systematic, integrated manner. Furthermore, the results of the data analyses will be exploited further to provide new directions to develop injury countermeasures and regulations.
Automotive Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and TechnologyrnAbstract: The degrees of injury severity, as a rule injuries scaled by AIS of specific regions of the human body, investigated out of road traffic accidents correspond to the body-specific loading values, which are found out with the aid of experimental or mathematical simulation of crash tests with motor vehicles or with sled tests. The coherence between the injured human being on the one hand and the physical and the theoretical model respectively on the other hand is established by the risk function, which describes the probability of degrees of injury severity in dependence on the protection criteria. Due to the different physical characteristics in the simulation, e.g. accelerations, forces, compressions and their velocity, the compilation of these quantities, comparable to the MAIS, the maximal occurred single AIS obtained in accident analysis is much more difficult in the simulation than in the accident occurrence. Therefore it is obvious to normalize the loading values gained out of simulation and to summarise them to an entire value in a suitable manner, the safety index.rn
Bicyclists are minimally or unprotected road users. Their vulnerability results in a high injury risk despite their relatively low own speed. However, the actual injury situation of bicyclists has not been investigated very well so far. The purpose of this study was to analyze the actual injury situation of bicyclists in Germany to create a basis for effective preventive measures. Technical and medical data were prospectively collected shortly after the accident at the accident scenes and medical institutions providing care for the injured. Data of injured bicyclists from 1985 to 2003 were analyzed for the following parameters: collision opponent, collision type, collision speed (km/h), Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), Maximum AIS (MAIS), incidence of polytrauma (Injury Severity Score >16), incidence of death (death before end of first hospital stay). 4,264 injured bicyclists were included. 55% were male and 45% female. The age was grouped to preschool age in 0.9%, 6 to 12 years in 10.8%, 13 to 17 years in 10.4%, 18 to 64 years in 64.7%, and over 64 years in 13.2%. The MAIS was 1 in 78.8%, 2 in 17.0%, 3 in 3.0%, 4 in 0.6%, 5 in 0.4%, and 6 in 0.2%. The incidence of polytrauma was 0.9%, and the incidence of death was 0.5%. The incidence of injuries to different body regions was as follows: head, 47.8%; neck, 5.2%, thorax, 21%; upper extremities, 46.3%; abdomen, 5.8%; pelvis, 11.5%, lower extremities, 62.1%. The accident location was urban in 95.2%, and rural in 4.8%. The accidents happened during daylight in 82.4%, during night in 12.2%, and during dawn/dusk in 5.3%. The road situation was as follows: straight, 27.3%; bend, 3.0%; junction, 32.0%; crossing, 26.4%; gate, 5.9%; others, 5.4%. The collision opponents were cars in 65.8%, trucks in 7.2%, bicycles in 7.4%, standing objects in 8.8%, multiple objects in 4.3%, and others in 6.5%. The collision speed was grouped <31 in 77.9%, 31-50 in 4.9%, 51-70 in 3.7%, and >70 in 1.5%. The helmet use rate was 1.5%. 68% of the registered head injuries were located in the effective helmet protection area. In bicyclists, head and extremities are at high risk for injuries. The helmet use rate is unsatisfactorily low. Remarkably, two thirds of the head injuries could have been prevented by helmets. Accidents are concentrated to crossings, junctions and gates. A significant lower mean injury severity was observed in victims using separate bicycle lanes. These results do strongly support the extension or addition of bicycle lanes and their consequent use. However, the lanes are frequently interrupted at crossings and junctions. This emphasizes also the important endangering of bicyclists coming from crossings, junctions and gates, i.e. all situations in which contact of bicyclists to motorized vehicles is possible. Redesigning junctions and bicycle traffic lanes to minimize the possibility of this dangerous contact would be preventive measures. A more consequent helmet use and use and an extension of bicycle paths for a better separation of bicyclists and motorized vehicle would be simple but very effective preventive measures.
Internationally, the need is expressed for harmonized traffic accident data collection (PSN, PENDANT, etc.). Together with this effort of harmonization, traffic accident investigation moves more and more in the direction of accident causation. As current methods only partly address these needs, a new method was set up. The main characteristics of this method are: • Accident/injury causation (associated) factors can objectively be identified and quantified, by comparison with exposure information from a normal population. • All relevant accident and exposure data can be included: human-, vehicle-, and environmental related data for the pre-crash, crash and postcrash situation (the so-called Haddon matrix). The level of detail can be chosen depending on interest and/or budget, which makes the method very flexible. In this paper the accident collection and control group method are presented, including some of the achieved results from a pilot study on 30 truck accidents and 30 control locations. The data were analyzed by using cross-tabulations and classification-tree analysis. The method proved useful for the identification of statistically significant causational aspects.
In recent years the boundaries between active and passive safety blurred more and more. Passive safety in the traditional term includes all safety aspects to prevent occupants to be injured or at least injury severity should be reduced. Passive Safety starts with the collision (first vehicle contact) and ends with rescue (open vehicle doors). Within this phase the occupant has to be protected by the passenger compartment whereby no intrusion should occur. Active safety on the other side was developed to interact prior to the collision whereby the goal is to prevent accidents. The extensive interaction between active and passive safety led to the terminologies "Primary" and "Secondary" safety whereas the expression Integrated Safety Concept was generated. Within this study the most well documented single vehicle accidents with cars not equipped with ESP were identified from the PENDANT database and reconstructed. Additional cases were found in the database ZEDATU of TU Graz. In comparison each case was simulated with the assumption that the cars were equipped with ESP. The differences regarding accident avoidance or crash severity as well as reduction of injury risk were analysed.
In recent years special attention has been paid to reducing the number of fatalities resulting from road traffic accidents. The ambitious target to cut in half the number of road users who are killed each year by 2010 compared with the 2001 figures, as set out in the European White Paper "European Transport Policy for 2010: Time to Decide" implies a general approach covering all kinds of road users. Much has been achieved, e.g. in relation to the safety of car passengers and pedestrians but PTW accidents still represent a significant proportion of fatal road accidents. More than 6,000 motorcyclists die annually on European roads which amounts to 16% of the EU-15 road fatalities. The European Commission therefore launched in 2004 a Sub- Project dealing with motorcycle accidents within an Integrated Project called APROSYS (Advanced PROtection SYStems) forming part of the 6th Framework Programme. In a first step, the combined national statistical data collections of Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and Spain were analysed. Amongst other things parameters like accident location, road conditions, road alignment and injury severity have been explored. The main focus of the analysis was on serious and fatal motorcycle accidents and the results showed similar trends in all four countries. From these results 7 accident scenarios were selected for further investigation via such in-depth databases as the DEKRA database, the GIDAS 2002 database, the COST 327 database and the Dutch element of the MAIDS database. Three tasks, namely the study of PTW collisions with passenger cars, PTW accidents involving road infrastructure features, and motorcyclist protective devices have been assessed and these will concentrate inter alia on accident causes, rider kinematics and injury patterns. A detailed literature review together with the findings of the in-depths database analysis is presented in the paper. Conclusions are drawn and the further stages of the project are highlighted.
In Germany, in-depth accident investigations are carried out in the Hannover area since 1973. In 1999 a second region was added with surveys in Dresden and the surrounding area. Internationally, the acronym GIDAS (German In-Depth Accident Study) is commonly used for these surveys. Compared to many other countries, the sample sizes of the GIDAS surveys are much larger. The goal is to collect 1.000 accidents involving personal injuries per year and region. Data collection takes place by using a sampling procedure, which can be interpreted as a two-stage process with time intervals as primary units and accidents as secondary units. An important question is, to what extend these samples are representative for the target population from which they are drawn. Analyses show, for example, that accidents with persons killed or seriously injured are overrepresented in the samples compared to accidents with slightly injured persons. This means, that these data are subject to biases due to uncontrolled variation of sample inclusion probability. Therefore, appropriate weighting and expansion methods have to be applied in order to adjust or correct for these biases. The contribution describes the statistical and methodological principles underlying the GIDAS surveys with respect to sampling procedure, data collection and expansion. In addition, some suggestions regarding potential improvements of study design are made from a methodological point of view.