81 Unfallstatistik
Filtern
Erscheinungsjahr
Dokumenttyp
- Konferenzveröffentlichung (86)
- Buch (Monographie) (13)
- Wissenschaftlicher Artikel (3)
- Bericht (1)
- Arbeitspapier (1)
Schlagworte
- Conference (82)
- Konferenz (82)
- Accident (71)
- Unfall (70)
- Statistics (44)
- Statistik (44)
- Germany (42)
- Deutschland (41)
- Injury (36)
- Fatality (35)
Institut
- Sonstige (104) (entfernen)
The overall purpose of the ASSESS project is to develop a relevant and standardised set of test and assessment methods and associated tools for integrated vehicle safety systems, primarily focussing on currently available pre-crash sensing systems. The first stage of the project was to define casualty relevant accident scenarios so that the test scenarios will be developed based on accident scenarios which currently result in the greatest injury outcome, measured by a combination of casualty severity and casualty frequency. The first analysis stage was completed using data from a range of accident databases, including those which were nationally representative (STATS19, UK and STRADA, SE) and in-depth sources which provided more detailed parameters to characterise the accident scenarios (GIDAS, DE and OTS, UK). A common analysis method was developed in order to compare the data from these different sources, and while the data sets were not completely compatible, the majority of the data was aligned in such a way that allowed a useful comparison to be made. As the ASSESS project focuses on pre-crash sensing systems fitted to passenger cars, the data selected for the analysis was "injury accidents which involved at least one passenger car". The accident data analysis yielded the following ranked list of most relevant accident scenarios: Rank Accident scenario 1 Driving accident - single vehicle loss of control 2 Accidents in longitudinal traffic (same and opposite directions) 3 Accidents with turning vehicle(s) or crossing paths in junctions 4 Accidents involving pedestrians The ranked list highlights the relatively large role played by "accidents in longitudinal traffic", and "accidents with turning vehicle(s) or crossing paths in junctions" (the second and third most prevalent accident scenarios, respectively). The pre-crash systems addressed in ASSESS propose to yield beneficial safety outcomes with specific regard to these accident scenarios. This indicates that the ASSESS project is highly relevant to the current casualty crash problem. In the second stage of the analysis a selection of these accident scenarios were analysed further to define the accident parameters at a more detailed level .This paper describes the analysis approach and results from the first analysis stage.
This study that was funded by the Research Association for Automotive Technology (FAT) develops a method for the evaluation of the placement of tanks or batteries by using the deformation frequencies in real-world accidents. Therefore, the deformations of more than 20.000 passenger cars in the GIDAS database are analysed. For each vehicle a contour of deformation is calculated and the deformed areas of the vehicles are transferred in a rangy matrix of deformation. Thereby, the vehicle is divided into more than 190.000 cells. Afterwards, all single matrices of deformation are summarized for each cell which allows representative analyses of the deformation frequencies of accidents with passenger cars in Germany. On the basis of these deformation frequencies it is possible to determine least deformed areas of all passenger cars. Furthermore, intended placements of tanks or batteries can be estimated in an early stage of development. Therefore, all vehicles with deformations in the intended tank areas can be analysed individually. Considering numerous parameters out of the GIDAS database (e.g. collision speed, kind of accident, overlap, collision partner etc.) the occurring forces can be calculated or the deformation frequency can be estimated. Furthermore, it is possible to consider the influence of primary and secondary safety systems on the deformation behaviour. The analysis of "worst case accident events" is an additional application of the calculated matrix of deformation frequency.
Accidents with vulnerable road users require special attention within the road safety work because these accidents are often accompanied with severe injuries. Thus In 2006 at least 6200 Powered Two Wheeler (PTW) riders were killed in road crashes in the EU 25 representing 16% of the total number of road deaths while accounting for only 2% of the total kilometers driven. For the prevention of accidents with VRU above all the knowledge of the causes of the accidents is of special importance. This study is based on the methodology of the German In-Depth Accident Study GIDAS. Within GIDAS extensive data on various fields of accidentology are collected on-scene from road traffic accidents with injuries in the Hannover and Dresden area. Using a well defined sample plan the collected data is highly representative to the whole German situation (Brühning et al, Otte et al). The need of in-depth accident causation data in accident research led to the development of a special tool for the collection of such data called ACASS (Accident Causation Analysis with Seven Steps), which was implemented in the GIDAS methodology in 2008 and described by Otte in 2009.
Small overlap frontal crashes are defined by a damage pattern with most of the vehicle deformation concentrated outboard of the main longitudinal structures. These crashes are prominent among frontal crashes resulting in serious and fatal injuries, even among vehicles that perform well in regulatory and consumer information crash tests. One of the critical aspects of understanding these crashes is knowing the crash speeds that cause the types of damage associated with serious injuries. Laboratory crash tests were conducted using 12 vehicles in three small overlap test conditions: pole, vehicle-to-vehicle collinear, and vehicle-to-vehicle oblique (15-degree striking angle). Field reconstruction techniques were used to estimate the delta V for each vehicle, and these results were compared with actual delta V values based on vehicle accelerometer data. Estimated delta Vs were 50% lower than actual values. Velocity change estimates for small overlap frontal crashes in databases such as NASS-CDS significantly underestimate actual values.
Causation patterns and data collection blind spots for fatal intersection accidents in Norway
(2010)
Norwegian fatal intersection accidents from the years 2005-2007 were analysed to identify any causation patterns among their underlying contributing factors, and also to evaluate whether the data collection and documentation procedures used by the Norwegian in-depth investigation teams produces the information necessary to perform causation pattern analysis. A total of 28 fatal accidents were analysed. Details on crash contributing factors for each driver in each crash were first coded using the Driving Reliability and Error Analysis Method (DREAM), and then aggregated based on whether the driver was going straight or turning. Analysis results indicate that turning drivers to a large extent are faced with perception difficulties and unexpected behaviour from the primary conflict vehicle, while at the same time trying to negotiate a demanding traffic situation. Drivers going straight on the other hand have less perception difficulties. Instead, their main problem is that they largely expect turning drivers to yield. When this assumption is violated, they are either slow to react or do not react at all. Contributing factors often pointed to in literature, e.g. high speed, drugs and/or alcohol and inadequate driver training, played a role in 12 of 28 accidents. While this confirms their prevalence, it also indicates that most drivers end up in these situations due to combinations of less auspicious contributing factors. In terms of data collection and documentation, information on blunt end factors (those more distant in time/space, yet important for the development of events) was more limited than information on sharp end factors (those close in time/space to the crash). A possible explanation is that analysts may view some blunt end factors as event circumstances rather than contributing factors in themselves, and therefore do not report them. There was also an asymmetry in terms of reported obstructions to view due to signposts and vegetation. While frequently reported as contributing for turning drivers, they were rarely reported as contributing for their counterparts in the same accidents. This probably reflects an involuntary focus of the analyst on identifying contributing factors for the driver legally held liable, while less attention is paid to the driver judged not at fault. Since who to blame often is irrelevant from a countermeasure development point of view, this underlying investigator mindset needs addressing to avoid future bias in crash investigation reports.
Recent findings from real-world accident data have shown that fatality risks for pedestrians are substantially lower than generally reported in the traffic safety literature. One of the keys to this insight has been the large and random sample of car-to-pedestrian crashes available in the German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS). Another key factor has been the proper use of weight factors in order to adjust for outcome-based sampling bias in the accident data. However, a third factor, a priori of unknown importance, has not yet been properly analysed. This is the influence of errors in impact speed estimation. In this study, we derived a statistical model of the impact speed errors for pedestrian accidents present in the GIDAS database. The error model was then applied to investigate the effect of the estimation error on the pedestrian fatality risk as a function of car impact speed. To this end, we applied a method known as the SIMulation-EXtrapolation (SIMEX) method. It was found that the risk curve is fairly tolerant to some amount of random measurement error, but that it does become flattened. It is therefore important that the accident investigations and reconstructions are of high quality to assure that systematic errors are minimised and that the random errors are under control.
The NHTSA-sponsored Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) has collected and analyzed crash, vehicle damage, and detailed injury data from over 4000 case occupants who were patients admitted to Level-I trauma centers following involvement in motor vehicle crashes. Since 2005, CIREN has used a methodology known as "BioTab" to analyze and document the causes of injuries resulting from passenger vehicle crashes. BioTab was developed to provide a complete evidenced-based method to describe and document injury causation from in-depth crash investigations with confidence levels assigned to the causes of injury based on the available evidence. This paper describes how the BioTab method is being used in CIREN to leverage the data collected from in-depth crash investigations, and particularly the detailed injury data available in CIREN, to develop evidence-based assessments of injury causation. CIREN case examples are provided to demonstrate the ability of the BioTab method to improve real-world crash/injury data assessment.
Sowohl die Zahl der im Straßenverkehr Getöteten wie auch die der Schwerverletzten sind nach Angaben der amtlichen Statistiken in Deutschland seit Jahren rückläufig. Die Gruppe der Schwerverletzten ist allerdings sehr heterogen und umfasst alle Unfallopfer, die für mindestens 24 Stunden in einem Krankenhaus behandelt wurden. Die vorliegende Untersuchung versucht, mit Hilfe von Daten des Traumaregisters der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU) die Frage zu beantworten, ob auch bei den besonders schwer verletzten Verkehrsunfallopfern ein Rückgang der Zahlen zu beobachten ist. Dazu wurden "schwerstverletzte" Patienten definiert als solche, die im Injury Severity Score (ISS) mindestens 9 Punkte erreicht haben und zudem intensivmedizinisch behandelt werden mussten. Der Zeitraum der Untersuchung umfasst zehn Jahre von 1997 bis 2006, der für einige Fragestellungen zusätzlich in zwei je 5-jährige Phasen unterteilt wurde. Ab 2002 (Phase 2) ist auch eine separate Auswertung für Fahrrad- und Motorradfahrer möglich. Die erste Fragestellung richtete sich auf die Veränderung der Anzahl schwerstverletzter Verkehrsunfallopfer über die Zeit. Dafür wurden die Daten von über 11.000 Patienten aus 67 verschiedenen Kliniken betrachtet. Pro Klinik wurde ein Durchschnittswert für die Anzahl von Verkehrsunfallopfern bestimmt, der dann mit der tatsächlich beobachteten Zahl verglichen wurde. Im Ergebnis zeigte sich, dass die relativen Abweichungen vom Durchschnitt insgesamt nur etwa -±10% betragen und dass kein deutlicher Trend einer Abnahme oder Zunahme der Schwerstverletztenzahlen in den vergangenen 10 Jahren erkennbar ist. In der zweiten Fragestellung wurde untersucht, ob und wie stark ein Rückgang der Letalität zu einem Anstieg der Schwerstverletztenzahlen geführt haben könnte. Es konnte gezeigt werden, dass in den letzten beiden Jahren deutlich weniger Patienten im Krankenhaus verstorben sind, als dies nach ihrer Prognose zu erwarten gewesen wäre. Dieser Rückgang der Letalitätsrate von absolut bis zu 5 (in 2006: Prognose 18% versus beobachtet 13%) trägt damit auch zu einer Zunahme bei der Zahl der Schwerstverletzten bei. Zur Abschätzung der Prognose wurde ein im Traumaregister entwickeltes und validiertes Scoresystem (RISC) eingesetzt. In der letzten Fragestellung sollte geklärt werden, ob sich das Verletzungsmuster bei den Schwerstverletzten in den vergangenen zehn Jahren und abhängig von der Art der Verkehrsteilnahme verändert hat. Insgesamt konnte gezeigt werden, dass der relative Anteil der Autofahrer rückläufig war, von 60% auf 50%. Bei den verletzten Körperregionen zeigt das Schädel-Hirn-Trauma den deutlichsten Rückgang von 69 % auf 60% insgesamt. Dieser Trend ist bei allen Verkehrsbeteiligten erkennbar. Lediglich Verletzungen der Wirbelsäule werden häufiger gesehen, was aber auch ein Effekt der verbesserten CT-Diagnostik sein kann, zum Beispiel beim Ganzkörper-CT. Je nach Art der Verkehrsbeteiligung zeigen sich sehr unterschiedliche Verletzungsmuster. Verletzungen des Kopfes sind bei Radfahrern und Fußgängern dominierend (über 70%), während Motorradfahrer hier die günstigsten Raten zeigen (45%). Motorrad- und Autofahrer haben die höchsten Raten für Verletzungen des Brustkorbs und im Bauchraum, bedingt durch die im Mittel höheren einwirkenden Kräfte auf den Körper. Insgesamt lassen sich die Daten des DGU-Traumaregisters gut nutzen, um typische Verletzungsmuster zu beschreiben und um relative Veränderungen bei der Zahl der Schwerstverletzten über die Zeit nachzuweisen. Beobachtungszeiträume von zehn Jahren und mehr, wie im vorliegenden Fall, ermöglichen auch aktuelle Trendaussagen. Epidemiologische Aussagen wie in den amtlichen Statistiken sind aber nur sehr eingeschränkt möglich, da das Traumaregister bisher nur auf freiwilliger Basis Daten sammelt.
Crash involvement studies using routine accident and exposure data : a case for case-control designs
(2009)
Fortunately, accident involvement is a rare event: the chance of an individual road user trip to end up in a crash is close to zero. Thus, according to general epidemiological principles one can expect the case-control study design to be especially suitable for quantifying the relative risk (odds ratio) of accident involvement of road users with a certain risk factor as compared to road users that do not have this characteristic. Ideally, of course, the database for such a case-control study should be established by drawing two independent random samples of cases (accidental units) and controls (nonaccidental units), respectively. If, however, special data collection is not an option, it is nevertheless possible to analyze routine accident and exposure data under a case-control design in order to fully exploit the information contained in already existing databases. As a prerequisite, accident and exposure data from different sources are to be combined in a single file of micro or grouped data in a way consistent with the case-control study design. Among other things, the proposed methodological approach offers the possibility to use in-depth data of the GIDAS type also in investigations of active vehicle safety by combining this data with appropriate vehicle trip data collected in mobility surveys.
Methods for analyzing the efficiency of primary safety measures based on real life accident data
(2009)
Primary safety measures are designed to help to avoid accidents or, if this is not possible, to stabilize respectively reduce the dynamics of the vehicle to such an extent that the secondary safety measures are able to act as good as possible. The efficiency of a primary safety measure is a criterion for the effectiveness, with which a system of primary safety succeeds in avoiding or mitigation the severity of accidents within its range of operation and in interactionwith driver and vehicle. Based on Daimler-´s philosophy of the "Real Life Safety" the reflection of the real world accidents in the systems range of operation is both starting point as well as benchmark for its optimization. This paper deals with the methodology to perform assessments of statistical representative efficiency of primary safety measures. To be able to carry out an investigation concerning the efficiency of a primary safety measure in a transparent and comparable way basic definitions and systematics were introduced. Based on these definitions different systematic methods for estimating efficiency were discussed and related to each other. The paper is completed by presenting an example for estimating the efficiency of actual "single" and "multi" connected primary safety systems.