81 Unfallstatistik
Filtern
Sprache
- Englisch (88) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Conference (84)
- Konferenz (84)
- Accident (57)
- Unfall (56)
- Statistics (37)
- Statistik (37)
- Germany (33)
- Deutschland (32)
- Fatality (31)
- Injury (31)
- Tödlicher Unfall (30)
- Verletzung (29)
- Data acquisition (26)
- Datenerfassung (26)
- Unfallrekonstruktion (26)
- Analyse (math) (23)
- Reconstruction (accid) (23)
- Analysis (math) (22)
- Datenbank (20)
- Schweregrad (Unfall, Verletzung) (20)
- Severity (accid, injury) (20)
- Untersuchung am Unfallort (16)
- Data bank (15)
- On the spot accident investigation (15)
- Cause (14)
- Motorcyclist (14)
- Motorradfahrer (14)
- Schweregrad (Unfall (14)
- Ursache (14)
- Fußgänger (13)
- Pedestrian (13)
- Severity (accid (13)
- Verletzung) (13)
- injury) (13)
- Car (12)
- Fahrzeug (11)
- Accident rate (10)
- Europa (10)
- Europe (10)
- Vehicle (10)
- Accident prevention (9)
- Cyclist (9)
- Radfahrer (9)
- Unfallhäufigkeit (9)
- Unfallverhütung (9)
- Motorcycle (8)
- Motorrad (8)
- PKW (8)
- Safety (8)
- Sicherheit (8)
- Simulation (8)
- Collision (7)
- Driver (7)
- Fahrer (7)
- Geschwindigkeit (7)
- Method (7)
- Risiko (7)
- Verfahren (7)
- Zusammenstoß (7)
- Active safety system (6)
- Insasse (6)
- Speed (6)
- Aktives Sicherheitssystem (5)
- Alte Leute (5)
- Bewertung (5)
- Database (5)
- Evaluation (assessment) (5)
- Old people (5)
- Rear end collision (5)
- Rechenmodell (5)
- Risk (5)
- Vehicle occupant (5)
- Analyse (Math) (4)
- Anfahrversuch (4)
- Auffahrunfall (4)
- Berechnung (4)
- Calculation (4)
- Crash helmet (4)
- Efficiency (4)
- Frontalzusammenstoß (4)
- India (4)
- Indien (4)
- Mathematical model (4)
- Pkw (4)
- Portugal (4)
- Risikobewertung (4)
- Schutzhelm (4)
- Accident reconstruction (3)
- Benutzung (3)
- Child (3)
- Decrease (3)
- Development (3)
- Driver assistance system (3)
- Entwicklung (3)
- Fahranfänger (3)
- Fahrerassistenzsystem (3)
- Head on collision (3)
- Hospital (3)
- Japan (3)
- Kind (3)
- Krankenhaus (3)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (allg) (3)
- Lorry (3)
- Overturning (veh) (3)
- Passive safety system (3)
- Passives Sicherheitssystem (3)
- Recently qualified driver (3)
- Risk assessment (3)
- USA (3)
- United Kingdom (3)
- Use (3)
- Vereinigtes Königreich (3)
- Verminderung (3)
- Überschlagen (3)
- Adolescent (2)
- Australia (2)
- Australien (2)
- Belastung (2)
- Bicycle (2)
- Compatibility (2)
- Czech Republic (2)
- Deformation (2)
- EU (2)
- Eindringung (2)
- Eingabedaten (2)
- Electronic stability program (2)
- Error (2)
- Fahrrad (2)
- Fehler (2)
- Head (2)
- Human factor (2)
- Impact test (2)
- Impact test (veh) (2)
- Improvement (2)
- Information (2)
- Information documentation (2)
- Input data (2)
- International (2)
- Interview (2)
- Jugendlicher (2)
- Junction (2)
- Kleidung (2)
- Knotenpunkt (2)
- Kompatibilität (2)
- Kopf (2)
- Lkw (2)
- Load (2)
- Menschlicher Faktor (2)
- Modification (2)
- Overlapping (2)
- Penetration (2)
- Seitlicher Zusammenstoß (2)
- Side impact (2)
- Software (2)
- Specifications (2)
- Standardisierung (2)
- Theorie (2)
- Theory (2)
- Trend (stat) (2)
- Tschechische Republik (2)
- Verbesserung (2)
- Verformung (2)
- Verkehrsteilnehmer (2)
- Veränderung (2)
- Zeitreihe (stat) (2)
- Überlappung (2)
- Abbiegen (1)
- Abstandsregeltempomat (1)
- Accident severity (1)
- Adaptive cruise controll (1)
- Age (1)
- Air bag (restraint system) (1)
- Airbag (1)
- Alter (1)
- Analyse (1)
- Auffharunfall (1)
- Ausrüstung (1)
- Austria (1)
- Batterie (1)
- Battery (1)
- Bein [menschl] (1)
- Bepflanzung (1)
- Brake (1)
- Braking (1)
- Bremse (1)
- Bremsung (1)
- Bus (1)
- China (1)
- Classification (1)
- Clothing (1)
- Coach (1)
- Coefficient of friction (1)
- Colthing (1)
- Cost (1)
- Cycle track (1)
- Delivery vehicle (1)
- Deutschalnd (1)
- Education (1)
- Eins (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogram (1)
- Elektronisches Stabilitätsprogramm (1)
- Equipment (1)
- Erziehung (1)
- Fahrstabilität (1)
- Fahrzeugteil (Sicherheit) (1)
- Fernverkehrsstraße (1)
- Financing (1)
- Finanzierung (1)
- Finite element method (1)
- Forecast (1)
- Forschungsarbeit (1)
- Fracture (bone) (1)
- France (1)
- Frankreich (1)
- Frequency (1)
- Front (1)
- Fuel tank (1)
- Geländefahrzeug (1)
- Geradeausverkehr (1)
- Gesetzesübertretung (1)
- Government (national) (1)
- Griffigkeit (1)
- Harmonisation (1)
- Hazard (1)
- Highway (1)
- Human body (1)
- Häufigkeit (1)
- Impact study (1)
- Jahreszeit (1)
- Klassifizierung (1)
- Knochenbruch (1)
- Korea (Süd) (1)
- Kosten (1)
- Kraftstofftank (1)
- LKW (1)
- Leg (human) (1)
- Leistungsfähigkeit (Allg.) (1)
- Lieferfahrzeug (1)
- Location (1)
- Main road (1)
- Man (1)
- Mann (1)
- Mathematical Model (1)
- Measurement (1)
- Medical aspects (1)
- Medizinische Gesichtspunkte (1)
- Menschlicher Körper (1)
- Messung (1)
- Methode der finiten Elemente (1)
- Mobility (1)
- Mobilität (1)
- Motorisierungsgrad (1)
- Netherlands (1)
- Niederlande (1)
- Norway (1)
- Norwegen (1)
- Nutzwertanalyse (1)
- Oberflächentextur (1)
- Occupant (veh) (1)
- Offence (1)
- On the spot investigation (1)
- One (1)
- Ort (Position) (1)
- Partnerschaft (1)
- Partnership (1)
- Passenger (1)
- Policy (1)
- Politik (1)
- Prevention (1)
- Public transport (1)
- QAccident (1)
- Quality (1)
- Quality assurance (1)
- Qualität (1)
- Qualitätssicherung (1)
- Radweg (1)
- Rail bound transport (1)
- Rail traffic (1)
- Reconstruction [accid] (1)
- Regierung (staat) (1)
- Regression analysis (1)
- Regressionsanalyse (1)
- Reibungsbeiwert (1)
- Reisebus (1)
- Republic of Korea (1)
- Research project (1)
- Residential area (1)
- Richtlinie (1)
- Richtlinien (1)
- Road traffic (1)
- Road transport (1)
- Road user (1)
- Rsk (1)
- Safety belt (1)
- Schienentransport (1)
- Schienenverkehr (1)
- Schweden (1)
- Schweiz (1)
- Schätzung (1)
- Season (1)
- Sicherheitsgurt (1)
- Significance (1)
- Signifikanz (1)
- Skidding resistance (1)
- Speed) (1)
- Spinal column (1)
- Sport utility vehicle (1)
- Standardization (1)
- Steifigkeit (1)
- Stiffness (1)
- Straight ahead (traffic) (1)
- Strasse (1)
- Straßentransport (1)
- Straßenverkehr (1)
- Surface texture (1)
- Switzerland (1)
- Technologie (1)
- Technology (1)
- Test (1)
- Thailand (1)
- Transport operator (1)
- Transportunternehmen (1)
- Traveler (1)
- Turn (1)
- Underride prevention (1)
- Unfallrate (1)
- Unfallrekonsruktion (1)
- Unfallverhütug (1)
- United kingdom (1)
- Unterfahrschutz (1)
- Value analysis (1)
- Variance analysis (1)
- Varianzanalyse (1)
- Vegetation (1)
- Vehicle handling (1)
- Vehicle ownership (1)
- Vehicle safety device (1)
- Veletzung) (1)
- Vereinigtes Königreichl (1)
- Versuch (1)
- Vorn (1)
- Weather (1)
- Wirbelsäule (1)
- Wirksamkeitsuntersuchung (1)
- Witterung (1)
- Wohngebiet (1)
- aktives Sicherheitssystem (1)
- analyses (math) (1)
- ar (1)
- tödlicher Unfall (1)
- Öffentlicher Verkehr (1)
- Österreich (1)
Institut
- Sonstige (85)
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (2)
- Präsident (2)
Rear-end collisions are the most frequent same and opposite-direction crashes. Common causes include momentary inattention, inadequate speed or inadequate distance. While most rear-end collisions in urban traffic only result in vehicle damage or slight injuries, rear-end collisions outside built-up areas or on motorways usually cause fatal or serious injuries. Driver assistance systems that detect dangerous situations in the longitudinal vehicle direction are therefore an essential safety plus. In view of this, for ADAC, systems that alert drivers to dangerous situations and initiate autonomous braking complement ESC as one of the most important active safety features in modern vehicles. The aim of ADAC is to provide consumers with technical advice and competent information about the systems available on the market. Reliable comparative tests that are based on standardised test criteria may provide motorists with important information and help them make a buying decision. In addition, they raise consumer awareness of the systems and speed up their market penetration. The assessment must focus on as many aspects of effectiveness as possible and include not only autonomous braking but also collision warning and autonomous brake assist. The work of the ADAC accident research is the development of the testing scenarios with direct link to accident situations and the identification of useful test criteria for testing.
Introduction: Spine injuries pose a considerable risk to life and quality of life. The total number of road deaths in developed countries has markedly decreased, e.g. in Germany from over 20000 in 1970 to less than 4000 in 2010, but little is known how this is reflected in the burden of spine fractures of motor vehicle users. In this study, we aimed to show the actual incidence of spine injuries among drivers and front passengers and elucidate possible dependencies between crash mechanisms and types of injuries.
The objective of the study is to measure the risk of pedestrian and bicyclist in urban traffic through an analysis of real-world accident data. The kinematics and injury mechanisms for both pedestrian and bicyclists are investigated to find the correlation of injury risks with injury related parameters. For this purpose, firstly 338 cases are selected as a sample from an IVAC accident database based on the In-depth Investigation of Vehicle Accident in Changsha of China. A statistic measurement of the fatality and serious injury risks with respect to impact speed was carried out by logistic regression analysis. Secondly, 12 pedestrian and 12 bicyclist accidents were further selected for reconstruction with MADYMO program. A comparative analysis was conducted based on the results from accident analysis and computer reconstructions for the injury risk, head impact conditions and dynamic response of pedestrians and bicyclists. The results indicate that bicyclists suffered lower risks of severe injuries and fatalities compared with pedestrians. The risks of AIS 3+ injury and fatality are 50% for pedestrians at impact speeds of 53.2 km/h and 63.3 km/h, respectively, while that for bicyclists at 62.5 km/h and 71.1 km/h, respectively. The findings could have a contribution to get a better understanding of pedestrians" and bicyclists" exposures in urban traffic in China, and provide background knowledge to generate strategies for pedestrian protection.
From literature well-known analyzes on risks, hazards and causes of accidents of older drivers are amended by the present study in which a comparison of the specific features of accident causes of older car drivers (older than 60 years) and of younger car drivers (under 25 years) is conducted. Mainly the question is pursued if specific errors, mistakes and lapses are predominant in the two different age groups. The analysis system ACAS (Accident Causation Analysis System) used hereby consists of a sequential system of accident causation factors from the human, the technical and the infrastructural field, whereupon for this study the influence of the human features on the accident development in two different age groups is of interest. ACAS is both an accident model and an analysis and classification system, which describes the human participation factors of an accident and their causes in the temporal sequence (from the perceptibility to concrete action errors) taking into consideration the logical sequence of individual basic functions. In five steps (categories) of a logical and temporal sequence the hierarchical system makes human functions and processes as determinants of accident causes identifiable. The methodology specifically focuses on the use in so-called "In-Depth" and "On-Scene" investigation studies. With the help of the system for each accident participant one or more of five hypotheses of human cause factors are formed and then specified by appropriate verification criteria. These hypotheses in turn are further specified by indicators in such manner that the coding of the causation factors by a code system meets the needs of database processing and are accessible to a quantitative data analysis. The first results of the descriptive comparison of the two age groups concern mainly differences in the functional levels "information admission/perception" (where the elderly drivers have more difficulties than the young ones) and "information processing/evaluation" (where the younger drivers show more problems). Concerning the cognitive function of "planning" the group of younger drivers seems to be more often involved in an accident because of excessive speed.
Injuries in motorbike accidents in correlation with protective clothes and mechanism of the accident
(2013)
This study deals with a possible connection between safety clothing / accident mechanism and injury severity in a state-wide traffic accident investigation with focus on light and small motorbike-involvement for accidents in the area of the Saarland in which the persons riding the bike have been injured or killed. An interdisciplinary team of medical scientists and engineers collected the medical and technical data as well as all the relevant traces of the accident on scene and in time. During twenty months of data collection a total of 401 cases could be gathered. Grave injuries were more common for the group of heavier motorcycles (>125 ccm). Motorcyclists had been polytraumatized only in the group where the accident was connected with a collision. Significant correlation between protective clothes and injury severity could only be found for protective gloves and protective trousers. The knowledge about mechanism of the accident, protective clothes and severity of injuries can be helpful for the improvement of road and motorcyclists' safety.
The overall purpose of the ASSESS project is to develop a relevant and standardised set of test and assessment methods and associated tools for integrated vehicle safety systems, primarily focussing on currently available pre-crash sensing systems. The first stage of the project was to define casualty relevant accident scenarios so that the test scenarios will be developed based on accident scenarios which currently result in the greatest injury outcome, measured by a combination of casualty severity and casualty frequency. The first analysis stage was completed using data from a range of accident databases, including those which were nationally representative (STATS19, UK and STRADA, SE) and in-depth sources which provided more detailed parameters to characterise the accident scenarios (GIDAS, DE and OTS, UK). A common analysis method was developed in order to compare the data from these different sources, and while the data sets were not completely compatible, the majority of the data was aligned in such a way that allowed a useful comparison to be made. As the ASSESS project focuses on pre-crash sensing systems fitted to passenger cars, the data selected for the analysis was "injury accidents which involved at least one passenger car". The accident data analysis yielded the following ranked list of most relevant accident scenarios: Rank Accident scenario 1 Driving accident - single vehicle loss of control 2 Accidents in longitudinal traffic (same and opposite directions) 3 Accidents with turning vehicle(s) or crossing paths in junctions 4 Accidents involving pedestrians The ranked list highlights the relatively large role played by "accidents in longitudinal traffic", and "accidents with turning vehicle(s) or crossing paths in junctions" (the second and third most prevalent accident scenarios, respectively). The pre-crash systems addressed in ASSESS propose to yield beneficial safety outcomes with specific regard to these accident scenarios. This indicates that the ASSESS project is highly relevant to the current casualty crash problem. In the second stage of the analysis a selection of these accident scenarios were analysed further to define the accident parameters at a more detailed level .This paper describes the analysis approach and results from the first analysis stage.
A total survey of road traffic accidents involving most severely injured, defined as sustaining a polytrauma or severe monotrauma (ISS > 15) or being killed, was conducted over 14 months in a large study region in Germany. Data on injuries, pre-clinical and clinical care, crash circumstances and vehicle damage were obtained both prospectively and retrospectively from trauma centers, dispatch centers, police and fire departments. 149 patients with a polytrauma and eight with a severe monotrauma were recorded altogether. 22 patients died in hospital. Another 76 victims had deceased at the accident scene. In 2008, 49 % of patients treated with life-threatening injuries were car or van occupants, 21 % motorcyclists, 18 % cyclists and 10 % pedestrians. Among fatalities at the scene, vehicle occupants constituted an even larger portion. The number of road users with life-threatening trauma in the region was extrapolated to the German situation. It suggests that 10 % among the "seriously injured" as defined in national accident statistics are surviving accident victims with a polytrauma or severe monotrauma.
Estimation of the benefits for the UK for potential options to modify UNECE Regulation No. 95
(2010)
The side impact problem in Europe remains substantial. UK data shows that between 22% and 26% of car occupant casualties are involved in a side impact, but this rises to between 29% and 38% for those who are fatally injured. This indicates the more injurious nature of side impacts compared with frontal impacts. The European Enhanced Vehicle safety Committee (EEVC) has performed work to address the side impact issue since 1979. As part of its continuing work, it has recently investigated potential options for regulatory changes to improve side impact protection in cars further. To support this work the UK undertook an analysis to estimate the benefit for potential options to modify UNECE Regulation 95. The analysis used the UK national STATS19 and detailed Co-operative Crash Injury Study (CCIS) accident databases. Of the potential options reviewed, it was found that the addition of a pole test offered the greatest benefit.
This study that was funded by the Research Association for Automotive Technology (FAT) develops a method for the evaluation of the placement of tanks or batteries by using the deformation frequencies in real-world accidents. Therefore, the deformations of more than 20.000 passenger cars in the GIDAS database are analysed. For each vehicle a contour of deformation is calculated and the deformed areas of the vehicles are transferred in a rangy matrix of deformation. Thereby, the vehicle is divided into more than 190.000 cells. Afterwards, all single matrices of deformation are summarized for each cell which allows representative analyses of the deformation frequencies of accidents with passenger cars in Germany. On the basis of these deformation frequencies it is possible to determine least deformed areas of all passenger cars. Furthermore, intended placements of tanks or batteries can be estimated in an early stage of development. Therefore, all vehicles with deformations in the intended tank areas can be analysed individually. Considering numerous parameters out of the GIDAS database (e.g. collision speed, kind of accident, overlap, collision partner etc.) the occurring forces can be calculated or the deformation frequency can be estimated. Furthermore, it is possible to consider the influence of primary and secondary safety systems on the deformation behaviour. The analysis of "worst case accident events" is an additional application of the calculated matrix of deformation frequency.
The NHTSA-sponsored Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) has collected and analyzed crash, vehicle damage, and detailed injury data from over 4000 case occupants who were patients admitted to Level-I trauma centers following involvement in motor vehicle crashes. Since 2005, CIREN has used a methodology known as "BioTab" to analyze and document the causes of injuries resulting from passenger vehicle crashes. BioTab was developed to provide a complete evidenced-based method to describe and document injury causation from in-depth crash investigations with confidence levels assigned to the causes of injury based on the available evidence. This paper describes how the BioTab method is being used in CIREN to leverage the data collected from in-depth crash investigations, and particularly the detailed injury data available in CIREN, to develop evidence-based assessments of injury causation. CIREN case examples are provided to demonstrate the ability of the BioTab method to improve real-world crash/injury data assessment.