81 Unfallstatistik
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
Schlagworte
- On the spot accident investigation (18) (entfernen)
Institut
- Sonstige (16)
- Abteilung Fahrzeugtechnik (2)
While it is important to track trends in the number of road accidents in different countries using national statistics, there is a need for data with more detailed information, so called in-depth accident data. For this reason, several accident data projects emerged worldwide in recent years. However, also different data standards were established and so comparative analysis of international in-depth data has been very hard to conduct, so far. This is why the project iGLAD (Initiative for the Global Harmonization of Accident Data) was established and created the prerequisites for building up a standardized dataset out of the common denominator of different in-depth accident databases from Europe, USA and Asia. In the first phase, the project received funding from ACEA to compile an initial database. To accomplish this, a suitable data scheme has been defined, a pilot study has been conducted as proof of concept and the recoding of the first common data base has been initiated. Also, to prepare the project for its self-supporting continuation in the next years, a business model has been developed. This paper reports the history and status of the project, the current challenges and the creation of a capable consortium to maintain the data. In mid-2014, the initial database containing 1550 cases from 10 different countries will be completed and a first detailed view on this data will be possible.
The Centre for Automotive Safety Research (formerly the Road Accident Research Unit) at the University of Adelaide in South Australia has a history of in-depth crash investigation going back to the 1970s. In recent years, our focus has been on studying factors that contribute to road crashes, with an emphasis on the role of road infrastructure. Our method involves crash notification by the South Australian Ambulance Service and detailed investigation of the crash scene usually before the crash-involved vehicles have been moved. This at-scene data collection is supplemented with police crash reports, Coroner- reports including autopsy findings for fatal crashes, case notes from hospitals for all injured persons, structured interviews with crash participants and witnesses, and computerised reconstruction of the events of the crash. One of the most notable research findings to emerge from our in-depth work has been the relationship between travelling speed and the risk of crash involvement. By comparing the calculated free speeds of crash-involved vehicles (cases) with the measured speeds of non-crash-involved vehicles travelling on the same roads at the same time of day (controls), we were able to establish that an exponential relationship exists between travelling speed and the likelihood of involvement in a casualty crash. This was the case for both metropolitan and rural areas. This research prompted the reduction of some speed limits in Australia, which has resulted in notable decreases in crash numbers. Another finding of interest in our recent investigation of 298 mostly daytime crashes in metropolitan Adelaide was that medical conditions make a sizeable contribution to the occurrence of road crashes. We found that almost half of the drivers, riders and pedestrians involved in the collisions had at least one pre-existing medical condition, and half of these individuals had two or more such conditions. We found that a medical condition was the direct causal factor in 13% of the casualty crashes investigated and accounted for 23% of all hospital admission or fatal crash outcomes. A follow-up study of all hospital admissions for road crashes in Adelaide is now going ahead to look further at this problem. The paper also describes studies looking specifically at pedestrian crashes. These include studies of the relationship between travelling speed and the risk of a fatal pedestrian crash, and studies utilising real crash data to validate headforms and test dummies used in the assessment of the safety of new vehicles in the event of a collision with a pedestrian.
Die amtliche Straßenverkehrsunfallstatistik kann nur in begrenztem Umfang Informationen zu Unfallentstehung, Unfallablauf sowie zu den zugrunde liegenden Verletzungsmechanismen bereitstellen. Verbleibende Informationslücken lassen sich durch spezielle Erhebungsteams schließen, die Verkehrsunfälle nach wissenschaftlichen Aspekten dokumentieren. Hierzu unterhalten das Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau- und Wohnungswesen und die Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen seit 30 Jahren ein Forschungsprojekt zur Unfalldatenerhebung an der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover. Seit 1999 erfolgt eine Kooperation mit der Forschungsvereinigung Automobiltechnik (FAT), die ein weiteres Erhebungsteam an der Technischen Universität Dresden unterhält. Die Unfalldaten gehen in die gemeinsame GIDAS-Datenbank ein, aus der sich umfassende Informationen zu den breit gefächerten Forschungsfeldern "Passive und aktive Fahrzeugsicherheit", "Verkehrs- und Rettungsmedizin" und "Straßenbezogene Sicherheitsfragen" gewinnen lassen. In der Zukunft werden Unfallvermeidungsstrategien und Unfallursachenprophylaxe im Vordergrund einer prospektiven Unfallforschung stehen. Die Daten werden auch in Zukunft für die weitere Verbesserung der Verkehrssicherheit einen bedeutenden Beitrag leisten.
This study analyses no.39 cases in which n.41 motorcyclists were fatally injured, or 36% of total motorcycle fatalities in Northern Ireland between 2004 and 2010 (n.114). There were n.17 cases (43.6%) where the actions of another vehicle driver caused the collision, in thirteen of these cases the motorcycles had their lights switched on. The remaining n.22 collisions (56.4%) were due to the actions of the motorcyclist. In the approach to the collision scene, there were n.13 cases (31.7%) in which the approach was a right hand bend and in n.8 (19.5%) cases, the approach was a left hand bend. In the remaining n.18 (43.9%) cases, the approach was a straight road. Of the n.17 (41.4%) motorcycles that slid after falling, n.10 (24.4%) fell onto their right side and the remaining n.7 (17.1%) fell onto their left side. The information from this study identifies primary and contributory causes of motorcycle collisions.
Die laufenden Erhebungen am Unfallort im Raum Hannover werden seit 1984 nach einem theoretisch fundierten Stichprobenverfahren durchgeführt. Da die Stichprobe nicht "selbstgewichtend" (gleiche Erfassungschancen für alle Unfälle) ist, müssen in die Datenauswertung Gewichtungsfaktoren einbezogen werden. Die Notwendigkeit der Gewichtung resultiert einerseits direkt aus dem Erhebungsdesign und andererseits aus verfahrensbedingten Verzerrungen, durch welche vor allem schwere Unfälle in der Stichprobe überrepräsentiert sind. Es zeigt sich, dass durch eine Anpassung der gemeinsamen Verteilung der Merkmale Unfallschwere, Tageszeit und Ortslage an die entsprechende Verteilung der amtlichen Unfallstatistik für das Erhebungsgebiet eine wesentliche Verzerrungsreduktion und Genauigkeitsverbesserung bei den meisten Variablen erreicht werden kann. Nach dem Konzept der replikativen Stichproben lassen sich auch approximative Konfidenzintervalle für die zu schätzenden statistischen Maßzahlen (zum Beispiel Mittelwerte) berechnen. Dem Problem der Übertragbarkeit der Ergebnisse auf die Bundesrepublik Deutschland insgesamt wird breiter Raum gewidmet. Im Rahmen einer umfangreichen Fallstudie werden die vorgeschlagenen Auswertungs- und Hochrechnungsverfahren an praktischen Beispielen demonstriert.
Data concerning accidents involving personal injury which have been collected in the context of in-depth investigations on scene in the Hannover area since 1973 and in the Dresden area since 1999 represent an important basis for empirical traffic safety research. At national and international level various analyses and comparisons are carried out on the basis of "in-depth data" from the above mentioned investigations. In-depth data play a decisive role e.g. within the validation of EuroNCAP results on secondary safety (crashworthiness) of individual passenger car models. Thus, statistically sound methods of data analysis and population parameter estimation are of high importance. Since the 1st of August 1984 the "in-depth investigations on scene" in the Hannover area have been carried out according to a sampling plan developed by HAUTZINGER in the context of a research project on behalf of BASt. In the meantime a second region of in-depth investigation on scene was added with surveys in Dresden and the surrounding area. Internationally, the acronym GIDAS (German In-Depth Accident Study) is commonly used for the two above mentioned surveys. The objective of a current research project (topic of this contribution) is, among other things, to examine and adjust the previous weighting and expansion method for the two regional accident investigations to the current general conditions.
Ziel dieses Forschungsvorhabens war es, das bisherige Gewichtungs- und Hochrechnungsverfahren für die örtlichen Unfallerhebungen in den Regionen Hannover und Dresden zu überprüfen und an die aktuellen Rahmenbedingungen anzupassen. Darüber hinaus sollten neue Möglichkeiten der gemeinsamen Hochrechnung von Ergebnissen aus beiden Erhebungsgebieten unter Berücksichtigung der aktuellen Datenlage, insbesondere in der amtlichen Unfallstatistik, untersucht und entsprechende statistische Verfahren entwickelt werden. Der Stichprobenplan der Erhebungen folgt einem zweistufigen Stichprobenverfahren. Tests mit einem zweistufigen Hochrechnungsverfahren der Hannover-Stichproben 2000 und 2001 auf die Gesamtheit Hannover haben jedoch ergeben, dass die theoretisch zu erwartenden Vorteile dieser zweistufigen Methode im Vergleich zur "einfachen Gewichtung" in der Praxis relativ gering sind. Unter Beibehaltung der bisherigen Gewichtungsprozedur (Anpassung an eine n-dimensionale Kontingenztabelle) wurden daher für die regionalen Hochrechnungen Dresden und Hannover alternative Methoden entwickelt, in der z.B. das Merkmal Ortslage durch die Unfallart ersetzt oder zusätzlich die Anzahl Unfallbeteiligter zur Gewichtung herangezogen wird. Leider erbringen diese Verfahren im Vergleich zur bisherigen (simultanen) Gewichtung nach Unfallschwere, Tageszeit und Ortslage nur wenige oder gar keine Verbesserungen der Anpassungsgenauigkeit bei Merkmalen der amtlichen Statistik, die nicht in die Gewichtung eingehen. Unabhängig vom Gewichtungsverfahren lässt die Abbildungsgenauigkeit bei einzelnen Variablen sehr zu wünschen übrig. Auf der Basis der Stichprobendaten 2000 wurde ferner noch ein Gewichtungsverfahren für Hochrechnungen auf das Bundesgebiet entwickelt und anhand der beiden Einzelstichproben sowie der gepoolten Stichprobe (Dresden plus Hannover) getestet. Die gepoolten Stichprobe zeigte die besten Ergebnisse. Allerdings ließen sich auch auf der Grundlage der gepoolten Daten nicht bei allen Merkmalen (gemeint sind hier Merkmale, die nicht Gewichtungsmerkmale sind) Verbesserungen des Fits erzielen. Es bleiben relativ große Abweichungen zwischen der gewichteten gepoolten Stichprobe und den bundesdeutschen Verteilungen. Es ist zu erwarten, dass auch bei vielen GIDAS Merkmale durch die Gewichtung keine essentielle Korrektur der Stichprobenverzerrungen erzielt werden kann. Insgesamt hat sich gezeigt, dass es auch mit alternativen, meist hierarchischen Gewichtungsverfahren nicht möglich ist, alle Merkmale, deren Verteilungen aus der amtlichen Statistik bekannt sind, mit hinreichender Genauigkeit an die Verhältnisse der Grundgesamtheit anzupassen. Es ist zu erwarten, dass sich dies bei den eigentlich hochzurechnenden originären GIDAS-Variablen ähnlich darstellt. Somit muss der Ansatz eines einheitlichen Verfahrens für alle Jahre und beide Erhebungsgebiete in Frage gestellt werden. Für besonders wichtige Fragestellungen sollte daher eine spezielle, auf das jeweilige Untersuchungsmerkmal abgestellte Gewichtung durchgeführt werden, wie dies exemplarisch am Beispiel der maximalen Kollisionsgeschwindigkeit gezeigt wurde. Schließlich werden im Bericht noch Empfehlungen zur Datenqualität und zu der Frage gegeben, wie sich das derzeit praktizierte Stichprobenverfahren im Hinblick auf die Gewinnung einer repräsentativen Stichprobe möglicherweise verbessern lässt.
Accidents with vulnerable road users require special attention within the road safety work because these accidents are often accompanied with severe injuries. Thus In 2006 at least 6200 Powered Two Wheeler (PTW) riders were killed in road crashes in the EU 25 representing 16% of the total number of road deaths while accounting for only 2% of the total kilometers driven. For the prevention of accidents with VRU above all the knowledge of the causes of the accidents is of special importance. This study is based on the methodology of the German In-Depth Accident Study GIDAS. Within GIDAS extensive data on various fields of accidentology are collected on-scene from road traffic accidents with injuries in the Hannover and Dresden area. Using a well defined sample plan the collected data is highly representative to the whole German situation (Brühning et al, Otte et al). The need of in-depth accident causation data in accident research led to the development of a special tool for the collection of such data called ACASS (Accident Causation Analysis with Seven Steps), which was implemented in the GIDAS methodology in 2008 and described by Otte in 2009.
Since 2008, the authors inspected fatal traffic accidents on the spot every year, with the cooperation of Toyota police station in Aichi pref. In the jurisdiction, numbers of fatal accidents were 18 in 2008, 12 in 2009, 14 accidents in 2010, and 16 in 2011. We here report the results of our analysis of information obtained by detailed inspection for those that occurred from 2008 to 2010. We focused on vehicle-to-pedestrian accidents, which accounted for about 45% of all accidents in 2008. Because many accidents occurred on residential roads not far from pedestrians" homes, it was revealed that the decrease of the collision speed by traffic calming such as humps and zone speed management, was highly effective. On the other hand, pedestrian detection technologies seemed to be also effective as a countermeasure on vehicle side. Every pedestrian position against a vehicle was clarified and TTC (Time to Collision) was calculated provisionally. Pedestrian accidents in intersections were also examined. Among the intersection pedestrian accidents within the jurisdiction, compared with the national average in Japan, the ratio of intersections without a signal and the ratio without a pedestrian crossing were high. According to the comparison of the Japanese traffic accident patterns between 2001 and 2008, pedestrian accidents during turning right and turning left did not decrease much. For elderly drivers, these accidents occurred very often. Finally, single vehicle accidents were analysed with the accident pattern analysis methods used above. There were high numbers of single vehicle accidents against object on single roads. Although fatal accidents against guardrails decreased, the numbers of fatal accidents against a utility pole and a sign pole were nearly constant. As for the impact with narrow width objects such as utility poles, the fatality rate was very high, and countermeasures of both road infrastructure and vehicles seem to be effective.
Causation patterns and data collection blind spots for fatal intersection accidents in Norway
(2010)
Norwegian fatal intersection accidents from the years 2005-2007 were analysed to identify any causation patterns among their underlying contributing factors, and also to evaluate whether the data collection and documentation procedures used by the Norwegian in-depth investigation teams produces the information necessary to perform causation pattern analysis. A total of 28 fatal accidents were analysed. Details on crash contributing factors for each driver in each crash were first coded using the Driving Reliability and Error Analysis Method (DREAM), and then aggregated based on whether the driver was going straight or turning. Analysis results indicate that turning drivers to a large extent are faced with perception difficulties and unexpected behaviour from the primary conflict vehicle, while at the same time trying to negotiate a demanding traffic situation. Drivers going straight on the other hand have less perception difficulties. Instead, their main problem is that they largely expect turning drivers to yield. When this assumption is violated, they are either slow to react or do not react at all. Contributing factors often pointed to in literature, e.g. high speed, drugs and/or alcohol and inadequate driver training, played a role in 12 of 28 accidents. While this confirms their prevalence, it also indicates that most drivers end up in these situations due to combinations of less auspicious contributing factors. In terms of data collection and documentation, information on blunt end factors (those more distant in time/space, yet important for the development of events) was more limited than information on sharp end factors (those close in time/space to the crash). A possible explanation is that analysts may view some blunt end factors as event circumstances rather than contributing factors in themselves, and therefore do not report them. There was also an asymmetry in terms of reported obstructions to view due to signposts and vegetation. While frequently reported as contributing for turning drivers, they were rarely reported as contributing for their counterparts in the same accidents. This probably reflects an involuntary focus of the analyst on identifying contributing factors for the driver legally held liable, while less attention is paid to the driver judged not at fault. Since who to blame often is irrelevant from a countermeasure development point of view, this underlying investigator mindset needs addressing to avoid future bias in crash investigation reports.