83 Unfall und Mensch
Filtern
Dokumenttyp
- Arbeitspapier (4) (entfernen)
Schlagworte
- Deutschland (3)
- Germany (3)
- Driver training (2)
- Expert opinion (2)
- Fahrausbildung (2)
- Gutachten (2)
- Modification (2)
- Planning (2)
- Planung (2)
- Veränderung (2)
Institut
Das Gutachten legt unter Berücksichtigung des aktuellen wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnisstands und der vorliegenden Vorschläge zur Weiterentwicklung der Fahrlehrerausbildung in Deutschland ein Konzept für Änderungen der Ausbildungs- und Prüfungsordnung für den Fahrlehrerberuf vor. Das erforderliche pädagogisch-psychologisch und verkehrspädagogische Fachwissen von Fahrlehrern wird definiert. Vorschläge zur Anpassung der Zugangsvoraussetzungen zur Fahrlehrerberuf werden erarbeitet.
Fahrschulüberwachung in Deutschland : Gutachten im Auftrag der Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen (BASt)
(2015)
Da die Ausgestaltung der Fahrschulüberwachung in den Zuständigkeitsbereich der Bundesländer fällt, bestehen zwischen den Bundesländern Unterschiede bezüglich der Form, des Inhalts und des Umfangs der Fahrschulüberwachung. Im Rahmen der Reform des Fahrlehrerrechts sollen die verschiedenen Umsetzungsvarianten beschrieben und weiterentwickelt sowie Wege zur Vereinheitlichung der Überwachung gefunden werden. Das Gutachten analysiert die rechtlichen Grundlagen sowie die inhaltliche und methodische Ausgestaltung der Fahrschulüberwachung der Fahrausbildung in den einzelnen Bundesländern. Der Stand der maßnahmenpolitischen Diskussion zur Weiterentwicklung der Fahrschulüberwachung sowie die Erwartungen der Bundesländer und der Interessenverbände wird dargelegt. Anforderungen an die Weiterentwicklung werden wissenschaftlich begründet und Umsetzungsmöglichkeiten beschrieben.
The BASt-project group "Legal consequences of an increase in vehicle automation" has identified, defined and consequently compiled different automation degrees beyond Driver Assistance Systems. These are partial-, high- and full automation. According to German regulatory law, i.e. the German Road Traffic Code, it has been identified that the distinctive feature of different degrees of automation is the permanent attention of the driver to the task of driving as well as the constant availability of control over the vehicle. Partial automation meets these requirements. The absence of the driver- concentration to the traffic situation and to execute control is in conflict with the use of higher degrees of vehicle automation (i.e. high and full automation). Their use is therefore presently not compatible with German law, as the human driver would violate his obligations stipulated in the Road Traffic Code when fully relying on the degree of automation these systems would offer. As far as higher degrees of automation imply free-hand driving, further research in terms of behavioural psychology is required to determine whether this hinders the driver in the execution of permanent caution as required by sec. 1 para. 1 StVO (German Road Traffic Code). As far as liabilities according to the StVG (German Road Traffic Act) are concerned, the presently reversed burden of proof on the driver within sec. 18 para. 1 S. 2 StVG might no longer be considered adequate in case of higher degrees of automation that allow the driver to draw attention from the task of driving (in case making such use of a system would be permitted by the German Road Traffic Code). The liability of the vehicle "keeper", according to the German Road Traffic Act, would remain applicable to all defined degrees of automation. In case of partial automation, the use of systems according to their limits is accentuated. The range of use that remains within the intended must be defined closely and unmistakeably. Affecting user expectations properly can immensely help to maintain safe use, in case design-measures that exclude overreliance are not available according to the current state of the art (otherwise such measures would have to be applied primarily). In case of the higher degrees of automation that no longer require the driver- permanent attention (under the presupposition their use would be permitted by the German Road Traffic Code), every accident potentially bears the risk to cause product liability on the side of the manufacturer. Liability of the manufacturer might only be excluded in case of a breach of traffic rules by a third party or in case of overriding/ oversteering by the driver. In so far aspects of German procedural law and the burden of proof are of great importance. The project group has identified the need for further continuative research not only to advance legal assessment but also to improve basic technical conditions for vehicle automation as well as product reliability.
The present report is a compilation of the evaluation results obtained by the end of 2009 in respect of the experimental novice driver training models "Voluntary further training seminars for novice drivers" (here: "VFT" model"). The models were initially introduced by the legislator on a trial basis in 2003 and 2005 respectively, and were to be evaluated and tested with regard to their road safety effectiveness prior to making a decision on the permanent integration into the driver licensing system. Alongside the question of road safety effectiveness (summative evaluation), the evaluation studies also analysed the experience gained from practical implementation of the individual concepts (process/formative evaluation). Whereas the safety impact is of direct significance for the decision on permanent adoption of the models, the results of the process evaluation are important independently of this decision for considerations of the possibilities for concept optimisation. The evaluation studies conducted by the Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt) were spread over a total of six sub-projects; complete and conclusive results are available for five of these sub-projects. The evaluation of the VFT model was unable to confirm the road safety effectiveness of this approach. It is especially disturbing to learn that participants in the VFT model display a significantly greater risk of accident involvement and traffic offences compared to novice drivers of the same age and with similar driving experience who have not attended a VFT seminar. Possible causes, insofar as a directly causal effect of the VFT participation is excluded, can most reasonably be assumed to lie in the curtailed effectiveness of the probationary licence rules in the case of VFT participants (participation is honoured with a shortening of the probationary period by up to one year) and self-selection effects in conjunction with VFT participation (model may attract above all those novice drivers with a tendency to conspicuous driving behaviour, as a means to achieve a shortening of the probationary period). In view of the significantly poorer driving behaviour of the VFT participants, and against the background of the aforementioned plausibility considerations regarding the underlying causes, however, it seems expedient to already now remove the incentive of a shorter probationary period in case of VFT participation. The evaluation of practical implementation of the VFT model revealed the need for further development of several points. This refers to the quality of the active, attitude-building training forms to be applied by the seminar leaders and moderators, as well as questions concerning optimised seminar organisation in the interest of training quality. It is here recommended that the seminar concept be subjected to a thorough review, and that the conditions for concept-adequate implementation be improved.